fredfredshaw at primenet.comFri Oct 1 14:50:03 EST 1999
THE FAUCI FILES: The IL-2 Antiviral Hoax, U.S. Patent # US1995000452440 October 1, 1999Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institutesof Health's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has been the single person in charge of HIV/AIDSresearch since the onset of the epidemic. Under Fauci'stutelage, fraud in research not only prospered, but hasbecome institutionalized (thanks, in no small part, toFauci's role in disbanding the ethics police). At theNational Institutes of Health, the crooks are firmly incharge and the rigors of scientific discipline have beensubstituted with the quick fixes of Junk Science schemes,bribes for bureaucrats and a proliferation of lucrative treatment hoaxes. While the HAART Treatment Hoax has flopped face-down in the steaming cow-pie of D.B.A.D. reality(Deaths Before an AIDS Diagnosis), perhaps it isn't too late to take a closer look at another treatment hoax: The Dr. Anthony S. Fauci IL-2 Treatment Hoax. Let'ssee what Captain Fauci has done to help himself as hedeliberately steered the HIV Research Titantic straight into the proverbial iceberg with his first and only patent(patent application details are included below): IL-2 Intermittent Therapy.While most inventors file dozens, or even hundreds of patentsbefore they have a winner, such is certainly not the casewith Dr. Fauci's first and only patent: IL-2 Intermittent Therapy. As a self-described "scientist", Fauci has proven that he is exemptfrom the hit-and-miss strategy of the invention process. Because"The Game" is rigged, only one patent will be required for Fauci"to win". What comes with this patent is a certain atmosphere of selective"shyness" by Dr. Fauci and the other top leaders of the enormousNIH, the health agency assigned the important task of safeguarding America's health. So what is it about Dr. Fauci's patent that turnsso many outspoken luminaries of medicine into a collective ofdeaf-mutes? What's wrong here? This is America and this is an invention, isn't it?Why isn't Fauci and The Gang celebrating like real Americans? Why must they act like they are embarrassed for their corruption,secret business deals and fifth-rate comprehension of science?While most inventors are deservedly so proud of the results of their long hours and diligent efforts that they WANT theworld to know -- why isn't that the case with NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, M.D.?Wouldn't you think that Dr. Fauci, NIAID and the NIH would havebeen proud to announce the approval of the first and only patentof perhaps its most important Institute Director? So why noannouncement? Why no press release? Why all the deafening silence?Why does Fauci offer spin control, obfuscation, deception and outright lies instead of facts? Why does the NIH close upshop when one inquires about Fauci's reported HUGE leaps in salaryat this government health agency? Why the stoned silence and bureaucratic smoke screens regarding reported "double-dipping" by Fauci? (Even NIH Director Varmus won't respond to confirm ordeny Fauci's reported retirement from the Public Health Serviceand re-employment in the Executive Service at five or more timeshis previous salary -- is Varmus covering up something illegal,such as Fauci being paid retirement AND salary simultaneously -- what's going on here???)Why won't Fauci speak of his personal business dealings with Chiron,the company which appears to have been summarily granted the manufacturing license for IL-2 in this non-competitive Byzantine atmosphere of secret business deals?Why does Fauci continue to personally direct and speak on behalfof his PERSONAL IL-2 patent conflict of interest when the NIH Attorney Robert Lanman stated over a year ago that the IL-2 research would be transferred to the National Cancer Institute,a claim that is obviously false? How bad can things bewhen even the NIH legal department gets caught in The Big Lie?While Fauci claims that his $150,000 annual "royalties" are"going to charity", why won't Fauci or Lanman or NIH DirectorVarmus disclose WHICH "charity" purportedly gets the cash? Might that be too embarassing when the "charity" turns outto be something ludicrous like "The Fauci Children's College Fund"or "The Fauci Institute" ? What about the PAST royalties(since 1993)? Of course, the $150K annual royalty is "chump change" when compared to the tens of millions that Fauci and friends stand to make on the IL-2 Treatment Hoax. As one would expect, this is where the Freedom of Information Act NIH/NIAID attorneys slamthe brakes on ANYTHING with Fauci's name on it -- ALL financialrecords, declarations etc. are off limits to the prying eyesof the American public. Why was Fauci's name conspicuously missing from the patent of thesame name that was filed in 1993 when Fauci and his subordinatesLane and Kovacs had already been engaged in years of taxpayer-funded IL-2 human experiments at NIAID? Why didFauci keep his name off the patent until December, 1997when the Patent Office approved the same patent, but this timewith Fauci listed as inventor?Director Fauci claimed that the omission of his name from his only patent at that point was due to a "clerical error". Are we alsoto believe that the army of patent attorneys retained by theNIH also managed to "overlook" the tiny detail having to do with putting the #1 Director's name on his only patent?Are we to also believe that the same clerical error wasrepeated when Fauci's name was omitted from the Lane/Kovacs 1995 article about IL-2 published in the New England Journal of Medicine (where the IL-2 patent was disclosed)?After over a decade of millions of taxpayer dollars for DOZENS ofFauci-directed IL-2 "clinical trials", why is it that (in 1999) the ONLY actual claim of "efficacy" seems to end up witha single unpublished and non-peer-reviewed anecdotal case of a person who was perfectly healthy and HIV-positive when the clinical "trial" was started? Indeed, a real scientistwould instinctively apply Occam's Razor to explain that thepatient would have even been BETTER OFF in the total absenceof toxic interventionist "treatment"! But that has nothing todo with the bottom-rung scientists of Fauci's ilk and today's Orwellian standard of medical Junk Science.Why study a toxic and dangerous treatment like IL-2 using healthyHIV-positive people? Perhaps the question has more to do with whichstudy group would put the best possible face on a harmful treatment.After all, Fauci, Lane and Kovacs admitted long ago that IL-2didn't "work" for sick people. It made them sicker faster. Itkilled them. It caused and/or promoted cancers. So what do theseGiants of Junk Science do? They begin to study a treatmentfor the "sick" -- IL-2 -- in the healthiest non-sick people they could find! Now they claim that IL-2 can only "work"when those healthy people are also using a cocktail of cancerdrugs known as "HAART" (the "cocktail treatment" trend is an important drug industry concept as it entirely obliterates the notion of accountability or blame for any single treatment option when the 20-something year old non-AIDS HIV+ patient plops over dead of a heart attack, stroke or other acute organ system failure, as has been the case with HAART).So now you know what your government's public servants havebeen up to for the past couple of decades in HIV, but not necessarily AIDS, research. In fact, as an independent statisticalmeasure, the surge in the category known as "D.B.A.D." tellsus exactly how we are doing these days -- specificallyin the area of "Deaths Before (an) AIDS Diagnosis". If thesepeople aren't dying of AIDS, then what's been killing themin droves, if not the cancer drugs that have been repackagedas HAART "antiviral" cocktails?fredThis detail information can be viewed in its entirety at: http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?pn=US05696079__US5696079: Immunologic enhancement with intermittent interleukin-2 therapy Inventor(s):Lane; H. Clifford , Bethesda, MD Kovacs; Joseph A. , Potomac, MD Fauci; Anthony S. , Washington, DC Applicant(s): The United States of America as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC Issued/Filed Dates: Dec. 9, 1997 / May. 26, 1995 Application Number:US1995000452440Abstract:A method for activating a mammalian immune system entails a series of IL-2 administrations that are effected intermittently over an extended period. Each administration of IL-2 is sufficient to allow spontaneous DNA synthesis in peripheral blood or lymph node cells of the patient to increase and peak, and each subsequent administration follows the preceding administration in the series by a period of time that is sufficient to allow IL-2 receptor expression in peripheral or lymph node blood of the patient to increase, peak and then decrease to 50% of peak value. This intermittent IL-2 therapy can be combined with another therapy which targets a specific disease state, such as an anti-retroviral therapy comprising, for example, the administration of AZT, ddI or interferon alpha. In addition, IL-2 administration can be employed to facilitate in situ transduction of T cells in the context of gene therapy. By this approach the cells are first activated in vivo via the aforementioned IL-2 therapy, and transduction then is effected by delivering a genetically engineered retrovital vector directly to the patient. Attorney, Agent, or Firm: Foley & Lardner; Primary/Assistant Examiners: Ulm; John; Sorensen; Kenneth A.More information about the Immuno mailing list
Send comments to us at archive@iubio.bio.indiana.edu
THE FAUCI FILES: The IL-2 Antiviral Hoax, U.S. Patent # US1995000452440fredfredshaw at primenet.comFri Oct 1 14:50:03 EST 1999
THE FAUCI FILES: The IL-2 Antiviral Hoax, U.S. Patent # US1995000452440 October 1, 1999Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institutesof Health's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has been the single person in charge of HIV/AIDSresearch since the onset of the epidemic. Under Fauci'stutelage, fraud in research not only prospered, but hasbecome institutionalized (thanks, in no small part, toFauci's role in disbanding the ethics police). At theNational Institutes of Health, the crooks are firmly incharge and the rigors of scientific discipline have beensubstituted with the quick fixes of Junk Science schemes,bribes for bureaucrats and a proliferation of lucrative treatment hoaxes. While the HAART Treatment Hoax has flopped face-down in the steaming cow-pie of D.B.A.D. reality(Deaths Before an AIDS Diagnosis), perhaps it isn't too late to take a closer look at another treatment hoax: The Dr. Anthony S. Fauci IL-2 Treatment Hoax. Let'ssee what Captain Fauci has done to help himself as hedeliberately steered the HIV Research Titantic straight into the proverbial iceberg with his first and only patent(patent application details are included below): IL-2 Intermittent Therapy.While most inventors file dozens, or even hundreds of patentsbefore they have a winner, such is certainly not the casewith Dr. Fauci's first and only patent: IL-2 Intermittent Therapy. As a self-described "scientist", Fauci has proven that he is exemptfrom the hit-and-miss strategy of the invention process. Because"The Game" is rigged, only one patent will be required for Fauci"to win". What comes with this patent is a certain atmosphere of selective"shyness" by Dr. Fauci and the other top leaders of the enormousNIH, the health agency assigned the important task of safeguarding America's health. So what is it about Dr. Fauci's patent that turnsso many outspoken luminaries of medicine into a collective ofdeaf-mutes? What's wrong here? This is America and this is an invention, isn't it?Why isn't Fauci and The Gang celebrating like real Americans? Why must they act like they are embarrassed for their corruption,secret business deals and fifth-rate comprehension of science?While most inventors are deservedly so proud of the results of their long hours and diligent efforts that they WANT theworld to know -- why isn't that the case with NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, M.D.?Wouldn't you think that Dr. Fauci, NIAID and the NIH would havebeen proud to announce the approval of the first and only patentof perhaps its most important Institute Director? So why noannouncement? Why no press release? Why all the deafening silence?Why does Fauci offer spin control, obfuscation, deception and outright lies instead of facts? Why does the NIH close upshop when one inquires about Fauci's reported HUGE leaps in salaryat this government health agency? Why the stoned silence and bureaucratic smoke screens regarding reported "double-dipping" by Fauci? (Even NIH Director Varmus won't respond to confirm ordeny Fauci's reported retirement from the Public Health Serviceand re-employment in the Executive Service at five or more timeshis previous salary -- is Varmus covering up something illegal,such as Fauci being paid retirement AND salary simultaneously -- what's going on here???)Why won't Fauci speak of his personal business dealings with Chiron,the company which appears to have been summarily granted the manufacturing license for IL-2 in this non-competitive Byzantine atmosphere of secret business deals?Why does Fauci continue to personally direct and speak on behalfof his PERSONAL IL-2 patent conflict of interest when the NIH Attorney Robert Lanman stated over a year ago that the IL-2 research would be transferred to the National Cancer Institute,a claim that is obviously false? How bad can things bewhen even the NIH legal department gets caught in The Big Lie?While Fauci claims that his $150,000 annual "royalties" are"going to charity", why won't Fauci or Lanman or NIH DirectorVarmus disclose WHICH "charity" purportedly gets the cash? Might that be too embarassing when the "charity" turns outto be something ludicrous like "The Fauci Children's College Fund"or "The Fauci Institute" ? What about the PAST royalties(since 1993)? Of course, the $150K annual royalty is "chump change" when compared to the tens of millions that Fauci and friends stand to make on the IL-2 Treatment Hoax. As one would expect, this is where the Freedom of Information Act NIH/NIAID attorneys slamthe brakes on ANYTHING with Fauci's name on it -- ALL financialrecords, declarations etc. are off limits to the prying eyesof the American public. Why was Fauci's name conspicuously missing from the patent of thesame name that was filed in 1993 when Fauci and his subordinatesLane and Kovacs had already been engaged in years of taxpayer-funded IL-2 human experiments at NIAID? Why didFauci keep his name off the patent until December, 1997when the Patent Office approved the same patent, but this timewith Fauci listed as inventor?Director Fauci claimed that the omission of his name from his only patent at that point was due to a "clerical error". Are we alsoto believe that the army of patent attorneys retained by theNIH also managed to "overlook" the tiny detail having to do with putting the #1 Director's name on his only patent?Are we to also believe that the same clerical error wasrepeated when Fauci's name was omitted from the Lane/Kovacs 1995 article about IL-2 published in the New England Journal of Medicine (where the IL-2 patent was disclosed)?After over a decade of millions of taxpayer dollars for DOZENS ofFauci-directed IL-2 "clinical trials", why is it that (in 1999) the ONLY actual claim of "efficacy" seems to end up witha single unpublished and non-peer-reviewed anecdotal case of a person who was perfectly healthy and HIV-positive when the clinical "trial" was started? Indeed, a real scientistwould instinctively apply Occam's Razor to explain that thepatient would have even been BETTER OFF in the total absenceof toxic interventionist "treatment"! But that has nothing todo with the bottom-rung scientists of Fauci's ilk and today's Orwellian standard of medical Junk Science.Why study a toxic and dangerous treatment like IL-2 using healthyHIV-positive people? Perhaps the question has more to do with whichstudy group would put the best possible face on a harmful treatment.After all, Fauci, Lane and Kovacs admitted long ago that IL-2didn't "work" for sick people. It made them sicker faster. Itkilled them. It caused and/or promoted cancers. So what do theseGiants of Junk Science do? They begin to study a treatmentfor the "sick" -- IL-2 -- in the healthiest non-sick people they could find! Now they claim that IL-2 can only "work"when those healthy people are also using a cocktail of cancerdrugs known as "HAART" (the "cocktail treatment" trend is an important drug industry concept as it entirely obliterates the notion of accountability or blame for any single treatment option when the 20-something year old non-AIDS HIV+ patient plops over dead of a heart attack, stroke or other acute organ system failure, as has been the case with HAART).So now you know what your government's public servants havebeen up to for the past couple of decades in HIV, but not necessarily AIDS, research. In fact, as an independent statisticalmeasure, the surge in the category known as "D.B.A.D." tellsus exactly how we are doing these days -- specificallyin the area of "Deaths Before (an) AIDS Diagnosis". If thesepeople aren't dying of AIDS, then what's been killing themin droves, if not the cancer drugs that have been repackagedas HAART "antiviral" cocktails?fredThis detail information can be viewed in its entirety at: http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?pn=US05696079__US5696079: Immunologic enhancement with intermittent interleukin-2 therapy Inventor(s):Lane; H. Clifford , Bethesda, MD Kovacs; Joseph A. , Potomac, MD Fauci; Anthony S. , Washington, DC Applicant(s): The United States of America as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC Issued/Filed Dates: Dec. 9, 1997 / May. 26, 1995 Application Number:US1995000452440Abstract:A method for activating a mammalian immune system entails a series of IL-2 administrations that are effected intermittently over an extended period. Each administration of IL-2 is sufficient to allow spontaneous DNA synthesis in peripheral blood or lymph node cells of the patient to increase and peak, and each subsequent administration follows the preceding administration in the series by a period of time that is sufficient to allow IL-2 receptor expression in peripheral or lymph node blood of the patient to increase, peak and then decrease to 50% of peak value. This intermittent IL-2 therapy can be combined with another therapy which targets a specific disease state, such as an anti-retroviral therapy comprising, for example, the administration of AZT, ddI or interferon alpha. In addition, IL-2 administration can be employed to facilitate in situ transduction of T cells in the context of gene therapy. By this approach the cells are first activated in vivo via the aforementioned IL-2 therapy, and transduction then is effected by delivering a genetically engineered retrovital vector directly to the patient. Attorney, Agent, or Firm: Foley & Lardner; Primary/Assistant Examiners: Ulm; John; Sorensen; Kenneth A.More information about the Immuno mailing list
Send comments to us at archive@iubio.bio.indiana.edu