SAUDI ARABIA PLAYS A DOUBLE GAME, AS MANY SAUDI PRINCES FINANCE ISIS!

Chuck Hagel described ISIS as being as sophisticated and well-funded as any group that we have seen. They're beyond just a terrorist group… they are tremendously well funded, he said.  More than with any other militant group, the focus of the international community's attention is on the finances of ISIS, the revenue it earns from oil, taxation, extortion and looting.Saudi Arabia plays a double game, as many Saudi princes finance ISIS!Islam is a lie, Muhammad a criminal, the Koran is poison. This is the new slogan on the flag of Saudi Arabia modified to declare truth and liberation.The US-led coalition has directed a considerable portion of its air strike effort against the oil refineries and smuggling routes believed to be the mainstay of the group's financial survival in the belief that disrupting funding sources will ultimately precipitate its demise.The importance of financing in conflict is as old as conflict itself. The Roman orator Marcus Tullius Cicero observed that the sinews of war are a limitless supply of money.Saudi Arabia is a vast criminal enterprise masquerading as a state. Saudi Arabia remains one of the top five executioners in the world. The death penalty is still applied to a wide range of non-lethal crimes such as adultery, armed robbery, apostasy, drug smuggling, kidnapping, rape, witchcraft, and sorcery. Since 2009, appeals by the growing human rights movement in the country have been met with harsh measures such as arbitrary arrests, detention without charge or trial, unfair trials, and travel bans.More recently, during the Cold War, states sponsored political violence by funding and supporting proxies. However, the end of the Cold War, and the use of UN Security Council resolutions against countries such as Libya and Sudan, saw a dramatic decline in state-sponsored terrorism.The Arab Spring will eventually come to Saudi Arabia.  Despite generally good relations, Occident remains concerned about human rights conditions in Saudi Arabia and global terrorism of the Royal House of Saudi Arabia. Principal human rights issues include abuse of prisoners and incommunicado detention; prohibitions or severe restrictions on freedom of speech, press, peaceful assembly and association, and religion; denial of the right of citizens to change their government; systematic discrimination against women and ethnic and religious minorities; and suppression of workers' rights. While organizations such as Hezbollah continue to operate with state backing, post-Cold War terrorist organizations have mostly been unable to rely on state sponsorship, thus needing to source their own financing.Skilful financial management is at the heart of the success of any terrorist or insurgent organisation - it represents their lifeblood but is also one of their most significant vulnerabilities.If an Arab Spring uprising completely disrupted Saudi oil production,Occident and the global economy would face a massive economic and strategic crisis. Russia and Iran as oil-producing states would likely exploit the crisis to increase their power around the world while undermining Occidental influence, especially in the Middle East. To guard against the economic and strategic dangers, Occident should prepare emergency measures before such a crisis. Releasing strategic petroleum reserves in coordination with other countries, tapping the North American energy resources, and reducing domestic energy consumption would limit the impact of the crisis and facilitate recovery. However, it is also in the U.S. interest to use its influence and resources to assist allies and friends during the crisis.Securing and maintaining reliable funding is the key to moving from fringe radical group to recognized terrorist organization, from a hand-to-mouth existence to a more planned and organized model. Successful groups are often defined as much by their skills as financial managers as they are by their military expertise and ability to recruit fighters.In general, terrorist groups can draw on financing from two primary sources. Internally, funds are generated by taxation of people, businesses and transport routes; proceeds from kidnap and ransom; and profits from trade.  External funding is provided by donors sympathetic to the cause, be they wealthy supporters (often from Gulf state countries, sometimes referred to as the "Golden Chain") or members of the diaspora community.SAUDI ARABIA IS THE MAJOR FINANCIAL SOURCE OF TERRORISMSaudi Arabia is a disgusting terrorist country that financed the 9/11 attack.  As has been documented repeatedly, Saudi Arabia is the major financial source of suicide bombers, religious incitements, extremist schools, and terrorist mosques throughout the world.  Petrodollars finance many terrorist groups, such as Hamas, ISIS, Mujahedin Khalq, al-Qaeda, and Fatah al-Islam. As the Saudi ruling family's ally and protector, the U.S. government and other institutions cannot be silent while Saudi institutions continue to promote its deadly ideology, Wahhabism. As the protector of the Royal House of Saudi Arabia, Uncle Sam has a responsibility to make it clear to the Saudis that religious incitements are not only a threat to Occidental democratic institutions, but also to the international community as well.Donations are also sometimes transferred between like-minded terrorist groups. For example, the Nigerian group Boko Haram reportedly received $250,000 from al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) in 2012.In a letter from 2005, al-Qaeda's former deputy leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, called upon al-Qaeda in Iraq to transfer $100,000 (£63,700) because many of its own funding lines had been cut.Whilst donations can provide a source of initial seed-funding, they are vulnerable to disruption by the authorities and the supply is unreliable.To establish financial independence, terrorist groups need to move from primarily external funding to internal, self-generated funding that is more difficult for the international community to disrupt.Al-Shabab in Somalia is a good case in point. While the group receives some limited funding from external sources, it has developed a highly effective charcoal export business which generates up to $80m a year, according to the UN.Al-Shabab has also mastered another funding tool - business, personal and transport tax. Like ISIS, al-Shabab controls territory and population, operating a form of quasi-government in the areas under its control - raising taxes and offering some services, particularly security and justice, in return.IS promises services and food supplies to Muslims in areas it controls.The control of territory also allows lucrative businesses, such as the growing of opium poppies in Afghanistan, to flourish.Over $7bn has been spent on fighting the drugs trade in the country yet despite 13 years of a Nato-led effort, poppy cultivation is at an all-time high, with the Taliban exploiting Afghanistan's position as the supplier of over 90% of global opium output to earn up to $150m a year.Obama has called upon the international community to adopt strong measures, at national and international levels, to curtail the recruitment of IS fighters. What is not mentioned in the media reports is that the heads of State and heads of government who have endorsed America’s campaign against the Islamic State, advised by their respective secret services, are fully aware that US intelligence is the unspoken architect of the Islamic State, which is part of a vast network of US supported jihadist terrorist entities.Lest we forget, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, have been financing and training the ISIS terrorists on behalf of the United States. Israel is harboring the Islamic State in the Golan Heights, NATO in liaison with the Turkish high command has since March 2011 been involved in coordinating the recruitment of the jihadist fighters dispatched to Syria. Moreover, the ISIS brigades in both Syria and Iraq are integrated by Western special forces and military advisers.While international diplomacy is often based on deception, US foreign policy lies are no longer credible. What we are witnessing is a total breakdown of established diplomatic practice. The Forbidden Truth is that the Islamic State is an instrument of Washington, a US  intelligence asset.  ISIS is not an independent entity, nor is it an outside enemy which threatens global security, as conveyed by the Western media. While everybody knows this, the big lie prevails. The Lie becomes the Truth.The United Nations Security Council resolution calls upon member states to suppress the recruiting, organizing, transporting, equipping and financing of foreign terrorist fighters.  Specifically, the resolution points to the particular and urgent need to implement this resolution with respect to those foreign terrorist fighters who are associated with ISIS, ANF Al-Nusrah Front, and other cells, affiliates, splinter groups or derivatives of Al-Qaida.  But are these not precisely the opposition freedom fighters trained and recruited by the Western military alliance in their quest to unseat the government of Bashar Al Assad?ISIS are the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance. Their unspoken mandate is to wreck havoc and destruction in Syria and Iraq, acting on behalf of their US sponsors. The endgame is to transform countries into territories.Political leaders present at the UN Security Council session applauded the US counter-terrorism initiative. Hollande pointed to the fact that terrorism has taken on another dimension, and it wants to conquer territory now.Several US allies including Jordan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar which are currently involved in supporting ISIS and Al Nusrah are now involved in the US sponsored air raids allegedly targeted against the ISIS inside Syria.Turkey and Jordan have borders with Syria. Saudi Arabia and Turkey have borders with Iraq. The direct military involvement of these countries points to a scenario of escalation and sectarian warfare extending from the Mediterranean to Central Asia.In this regard, Turkey has already announced that it will be involved in ground operations inside Syria and Iraq. Davutoğlu announced  that his government will intervene militarily in both Iraq and Syria.What is at stake is a no fly zone in disguise, a justification to bomb Iraq and Syria under a counter-terrorism mandate, largely targeting economic infrastructure as well as the civilian population. The political architects of the Islamic State including Obama, Cameron and their counterparts in France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, et al, are now waging a military campaign against the Islamic State, which they themselves created. Boots on the ground are also contemplated. US will send some 13,000 troops to Iraq.The leaders of western countries are either utterly ignorant and stupid, or totally corrupt and complicit. The Terrorists R US. Moreover, they seem totally unaware of the broad implications of their actions.War propaganda is a criminal act under Nuremberg: Crime against the Peace. By upholding the lies and fabrications of US foreign policy, the mainstream media is complicit in war crimes.George W. Bush stated in 2001 you are either with us or with the terrorists. The forbidden truth is that the US is involved in a diabolical undertaking: it has created an Islamic terror network with a view to destroying sovereign countries and now it is waging a war against its own terror network. Without media propaganda, this military agenda under the guise of counter-terrorism would fall flat, collapse like a deck of cards.The US president and his indefectible British ally R the Terrorists, they are the state sponsors of terrorism, with a view to waging a war of conquest. The United Nations is complicit in this undertaking.The most critical issue for the United States is to create a single integrated plan that takes into account the most pressing challenges. Operationally, it might not be possible to engage all adversaries simultaneously, but conceptually, it is essential to think in terms of a coherent center of gravity of operations.  It is increasingly clear that that center is the Black Sea.There are currently two active theaters of military action with broad potential significance. One is Ukraine. The other is in the Syria-Iraq region, where the forces of the Islamic State have launched an offensive designed at a minimum to control regions in both countries — and at most dominate the area between the Levant and Iran. In most senses there is no connection between these two theaters.Russia has an ongoing problem in the high Caucasus and there are reports of Chechen advisers working with the Islamic State. In this sense, the Russians are far from comfortable with what is happening in Syria and Iraq. At the same time, anything that diverts U.S. attention from Ukraine is beneficial to the Russians. For its part, the Islamic State must oppose Russia in the long run. Its immediate problem, however, is U.S. power, so anything that distracts the United States is beneficial to the Islamic State.America is not going to use its military power on large scale. It plans to achieve its goals at the expense of regional allies. Turkey and Romania are two key relationships.The Islamic State is painted as a US enemy that America wages a fierce fight against. In reality the Islamic State is a valuable ally of the United States, the country which is pursuing the goal of converting the Middle East into a large hotbed hit by chaos to spread on Russia, China and other regions of the United States’ choice.The Islamic State is too special to openly talk about as a strategic ally. American public opinion would not reconcile with the fact that the US government and special services rub shoulders with thugs. That’s why the Islamic State is declared war on. The America’s actions are painted as a real crusade. But all this empty talk aside, the operation conducted against the Islamic State closely resembles the strange war waged between UK-French forces and Germany in 1939-1940.On September 23 the first strike was delivered against the radicals’ positions in Syria. An air phase is absolutely not enough. The United States has been involved in Iraq for more than ten years. It just cannot watch the advance of militants without lifting a finger. If it does it would surely lose the face. Air bombing is the least thing it can do to pretend it defends Iraq from terrorists.The combination of air power with special operations forces will not lead to elimination of the Islamic State or divisions inside the group. President Obama has said the United States would not have boots on the ground, it means somebody else will have to send ground forces. Iran appears to be a natural ally. But if it will become a warring party and act in the US interests, it would be logical to link such an involvement with other controversial matters affecting the US-Iranian relations. The nuclear program and lifting sanctions top the list of burning issues. No matter all the atrocities committed by the Islamic State, the Obama administration finds the Islamic State at least a lesser evil than Iran. At most it can treat it as an ally behind the scenes.With the US watching the situation evolve in Ukraine and Iraq-Syria, the Islamic State may gradually move to the Northern Caucasus making come to surface the underground forces there and opening a new front. The Islamic States has already declared Russia as its main enemy. One of the group’s leaders – Omar al Shishani - is an ethnic Chechen. Dmitry Yarosh, the leader of Pravy Sector, called on the Caucasus Emirate to join together in the fight against Russia.The Islamic State has long been in the making: in the think tanks and military planning offices of Israel. The plan to have a group like ISIL rend apart the Arab nation-states of the Middle East is enshrined in two Israeli policies: A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties written in 1982 by former Israeli Foreign Ministry official Oded Yinon and A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, largely written American neo-conservative war hawk Richard Perle for Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and issued in 1996. The latter report included contributions from Perle’s fellow Israeli agents-of-influence who have migrated in and out of sensitive United States government positions: Douglas Feith and David and Meyrav Wurmser.The group of neocons hired by Netanyahu, known as the Study Group on A New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000, have dominated U.S. Middle Eastern policy for over two decades and it was this group that was responsible for the disastrous U.S. policies that led to the occupation of Iraq and involvement in radical Islamic rebellions in Libya and Syria.The policy-making boiler shops that assisted in the foundation of ISIL in Syria and Iraq to implement the Yinon and Clean Break plans are located within the greater Washington, DC area within such pro-Israeli non-profit organizations as the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), and the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS).The Clean Break policy was long in the making for Netanyahu, who first floated the concept of a Greater Israel or Eretz Israel dominating its Arab neighbors through fratricidal civil wars at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism convened by The Jonathan Institute on July 2, 1979. The Jonathan Institute is named after Netanyahu’s Israeli commando brother, Jonathan Netanyahu, killed in the 1976 Israeli raid on Entebbe Airport in Uganda in order to free hostages aboard a hijacked Air France jetliner. British intelligence documents later revealed that Netanyahu died in a false flag operation designed by Mossad to create a wave of sympathy for Israel in France and other countries.The Yinon Plan, like the Clean Break crafted by Netanyahu’s neocon American Jewish brain trust, called for scrapping the entire Palestinian peace process and effectively annexing and absorbing the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, and Gaza. Recent Israeli proposals to forcibly resettle Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank in Egypt’s Sinai Desert under quasi-Israeli suzerainty indicates that Israel continues to have designs on a Gaza Strip forcibly depopulated of its Palestinian residents.The Yinon Plan, which was published in the Kivunim Journal for Judaism and Zionism, foresaw the breakup of Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Egypt, and Arabia into ethnic- and sectarian-based mini-states that would be at war with one another. These included at the very least a Sunni state, a Shi’a state, and a Kurdish state in Iraq.The Yinon Plan states: Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, at least three states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. The entire Arabian Peninsula is a natural candidate for dissolution due to internal and external pressures, and the matter is inevitable especially in Saudi Arabia.The appearance of ISIL on the scene, with its logistical, military, financial, and intelligence support from Israel, fulfills the plans of both Yinon and Netanyahu. Israel now stands ready to capitalize on the mayhem created by ISIL. In some respects, Netanyahu has modified the Yinon and Clean Break plans. ISIL is intent on establishing a single Sunni caliphate over all of Iraq and Syria while subjecting the Kurds, Shi’as, and other minorities to forced conversions to the Wahhabist Sunni sect or, otherwise, execution.There are also reports that ISIL is forcibly transferring child refugees from Syria and Iraq to West Bank settlements to increase the Israeli population. The idea that Israeli settlers, many of whom openly support ISIL by waving its flags on the West Bank and in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, are forcibly Judaizing Syrian and Iraqi Christians, Shi’as, Sunnis, Alawites, Druze, and Yazidis for future lives as West Bank Israeli citizens, rivals the worst ethno-demographic policies of the Nazi Third Reich.There have been reports from Iraq’s Anbar province, from where ISIL forces are sweeping towards Baghdad, that Israeli commandos have been witnessed handing over weapons to ISIL forces. In addition, at least one French Jewish teen was reported to have flown to Syria to join ISIL forces battling against the government of President Bashar al Assad. Israeli Defense Force troops have been witnessed exfiltrating ISIL and allied Jabhat al Nusra forces from Syria to the Israeli-held Golan Heights for medical and logistical assistance. Israeli war planes have bombed Syrian government forces while they were locked in battle with ISIL and Al Nusra forces.Illegal Israeli settlers from the West Bank have promoted ISIL at rallies held in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. The right-wing Israelis, who serve as core supporters of the Netanyahu government, have worn black ISIL t-shirts which blasphemously display the seal of the Prophet Mohammed and waved the black ISIL flag bearing the same seal.Iranian intelligence has determined that there has been coordination of anti-Iraqi government operations between ISIL and the Iranian terrorist group Mohajedin-e-Khalq (MEK), which is strongly supported by such notorious American neocons as Richard Perle and Rudolph Giuliani. Reports that ISIL units have crossed the border into Iran are coupled with reports of heightened MEK activity along the Iraqi-Iranian border. There is little doubt that Israel is coordinating the cross-border activities of both ISIL and the MEK inside Iran. There are also reports that ISIL and the MEK have held informal talks in France with the knowledge of Prime Minister Manuel Valls who is supposedly overseeing French military air operations against ISIL in Syria and Iraq. Valls’s wife, Anne Gravoin, is a well-known supporter of Israel. She is of Moldovan Jewish descent.Although ISIL receives much of its funding from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the Gulf emirates, its ideological mentor remains Israel. No Israeli politician or military leader has suggested ISIL poses any threat to the Jewish state. Apprentices seldom threaten their masters. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, an investor in the Rupert Murdoch’s neocon and fanatical pro-Israel News Corporation, has indicated that there exists an alliance of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and Kuwait. This unholy alliance that is using ISIL as its vanguard is also seeking to redraw the borders of the Middle East pursuant to the Yinon and Clean Break plans. This true axis of evil threatens Iran and Egypt in the short term and, in the long run, Russia and China.