Doctor Who Spilled Beans On Hillary's Health Just Got Taken Out By Clinton Thugs - Fury News

Longtime celebrity and radio show host, Dr. Drew Pinsky, was fired by HLN after recent comments were made concerning Hillary Clinton’s healthcare. HLN said last Thursday that “Dr. Drew on Call” will air its final episode on September 22nd of this year.

Dr. Drew’s critique of the type of medications that Hillary Clinton takes has apparently struck a nerve at HLN, a division of the CNN network. In a recent show, Pinsky proposes serious problems and grave health risks associated with the specific medications being prescribed to the Democratic nominee.

However, the information given by Dr. Drew has only verified the recent rumors concerning the odd behavior of Clinton and raises another concern. Why is Hillary taking medicine that is no longer used and known to cause other life-threatening illnesses?

Based on the medical records that were released by Clinton, Dr. Drew and his colleague, Dr. Robert Huizenga, agree that there is a grave concern in not only her health, but also with her healthcare. Dr. Drew begins by stating,

“Both of us concluded that if we were providing the care that she was receiving, we would be ashamed to show up in the doctor’s lounge. We would be laughed out.” Dr. Drew states, “She is receiving 1950s care by our evaluation.”

He then tries to explain Clinton’s medical history and the convoluted terms surrounding her conditions. “She is being treated for hyperthyroidism with something called Armour Thyroid.” Dr. Drew points out, “Which is very unconventional and something we used to use back in the sixties.”

Dr. Drew goes on to describe several medical conditions and drug side effects that could explain the odd behaviors and mishaps that the public has been seeing as of late. His diagnosis seems to fit the bill, but the fact that Hillary Clinton has been prescribed more than one out-dated drug has him perplexed.

“So she goes on Coumadin … that’s weird because Coumadin really isn’t used anymore.” Drew exclaims, “Certainly somebody who is a presidential candidate would get one of the newer anti-coagulants!”

Here is where we must stop and wonder this same question proposed by Dr. Drew. Why is Hillary Clinton being prescribed drugs that are no longer used and purported to have serious side effects if newer, safer drugs are available?

According to Science Daily, a patient’s request for specific drugs greatly affects the prescribing practices of medical professionals. Given the ability for a patient to choose their own medications, it is easy to believe that Clinton specifically requested these ancient drugs rather than believe that her doctor would prescribe them, especially since recent email leaks show Clinton’s interest in several medicines and treatments.

Last June, Larry Klayman at WND wrote that Hillary Clinton was responsible for the nomination of Margaret Hamburg as the FDA commissioner. This indicates that Clinton could have had insider knowledge into specific drugs and information about those drugs that was never released to the public. The emphasis added below is mine.

There appears to be substantial evidence that Hillary Clinton, while secretary of state, was responsible for the nomination of a woman, who had given substantial contributions to the political campaigns of Hillary Clinton, as Food and Drug Administration (FDA) commissioner. Her name is Margaret Hamburg, and her husband, Peter Brown, also had his company, Renaissance Technologies, contribute to the Clinton Foundation and other so-called charities. Thus, it is likely that Hillary got Hamburg, who hails from New York City, her job.

Buttressing this “unlikely coincidence” is the fact that in a lawsuit I filed for victims of Hamburg’s subsequent actions at the FDA, which alleged criminal racketeering violations through Hamburg’s and J&J’s suppression of material information about the highly dangerous effects of the antibiotic Levaquin, Hamburg is being represented by a criminal defense lawyer named Beth Wilkinson. Wilkinson is the same lawyer who has been defending Hillary confidants and accomplices, such as Cheryl Mills, Bryan Pagliano and many others in the ongoing FBI investigation of the illegal use of Hillary’s so-called private email server. Wilkinson has counseled these accomplices to assert Fifth Amendment privileges and improperly instructed witnesses not to answer relevant questions, in the recent depositions taken by Judicial Watch over the secreting of State Department records on Hillary’s private email server in response to various FOIA requests. In short, the link between Hamburg and Hillary Clinton is substantial for this and many other indicia too long to list in this column.

− via WND

While there isn’t any concrete evidence that Hillary had insider knowledge leading to the choice of a different drug than what is commonly used today, we can easily imagine this to be the true reason for prescribing a drug known by the medical community to be dangerous. This surmised knowledge only reinforces my own belief that modern medications are bad for you given the limited and biased testing as shown in recent scandals. I will continue in my abstinence of any and all pills.

H/T [Breitbart]