Time-Price-Research: Energy War over Syria │ The Geopolitics of Oil and Gas Pipelines
The war on Syria is only
unclear at first sight. On
closer inspection, it becomes clear that fighting between mercenaries and
government forces takes place only where important pipelines are running or
planned.
Russia,
the Western powers and the Gulf States are fighting for the best starting
position for gas and oil supplies for the European market. France,
the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia and the United States, in particular, are
interfering in the distribution struggle without any reference to international law, while Russia's support to the legal Syrian government is fully in line with international law.
Two
of the most important oil markets are located in the Syrian cities of Manbij
and al-Bab, both of which are located in the Aleppo province. These two cities
are also the most important pipeline, the oil from Iraq - from Mosul and
al-Qaim - transported to
Syria as far as the province of Idlib .
The
same Pipeline runs through the city of Aleppo to the oil market in Idlib. Whoever
controls Manbid, has a great influence on the oil transport in Syria. The
same applies to Aleppo, Idlib and al-Bab in the west of the country. In
the east of the country the same oil transport line runs through Raqq a and Deir
Ezzor . The
oil that flows through this transport line comes from Mosul, via Sinjar to Deir
Ezzor and a second strand from al-Qaim to Deir
Ezzor . So far, Turkey has had no
influence on the oil transport lines in the Syrian conflict. Through
the capture of Manbidz, Turkey could assert its influence on the transport
system in Syria. The
current battle for Aleppo is called only from a basic decision-making battle:
Aleppo is the last big city through which flows the country's most important
transport line. Anyone
who controls Aleppo controls the "key" of the pipeline. It
is striking that the conflicts between the conflict parties take place, in
particular, on the most important points of the transport lines: Raqq a, Deir
Ezzor, Aleppo, Idlib, Manbidsch, Hasaka, al-Bukamal, Ain Issa and al-Bab. In
Homs and Hama also violent battles take place. Previously, Palmyra was fiercely
fought. These,
in turn, are the areas through which the Qatar-Turkey pipeline is planned. The
Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline supported and planned by the Russians should also be
run by Homs. That
is why Homs from the Russian point of view cannot be controlled by the Islamic
mercenaries.
From
the map of the air strikes, it is clear that the US airspace mainly focuses on
the East and the Russian air strikes, especially on the west of Syria. While
the control of West Syria is important to the Russians to prevent pro-Western
pipelines, it is important from the US point of view that the prospect of
pro-Russian pipelines - like the Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline - to prevent.
Another
planned pipeline was originally to go from the Israeli Golan Heights via
Damascus to Turkey. This
pipeline would allow Israel to emerge as a gas supplier, provided the
government is overthrown in Damascus. But
Russia does not want any competitors in the gas market.
In
connection with the pipeline routes, the planned "Kurdish corridor"
is also critical. The
Caucasus Strategic Research Center (KAFKASSAM) in Ankara reports: "The
real objective of this corridor is to transport the Kurdish oil and gas from
the Northern Iraq over Northern Syria to the Mediterranean by pipeline
there. In
addition, the US had planned to build another pipeline from the Persian Gulf to
the Northern Iraq and from there via Northern Syria. Thus,
both Iraq and Turkey should be brought to the West and especially to Europe on
the energy market through both Turkey and Northern S yria. But
the plan to found a Kurdish corridor fell into the water because the Russians
intervened in Syria. Russia
is opposed to this corridor because Europe is to be maintained as a customer of
Russian energy carriers. Russia
will under no circumstances give up its position on the European market." See also HERE + HERE + HERE + HERE
 |
W ar a s the continuation of politics and economic interest by other means. |