Jimmy Dore seems to be pushing a very clear narrative here. He's also using some of the Alex Jones/No Agenda pre-sheep-programming methodology. It's very interesting.
Comey gives a pretty standard reply covering his ass with terms that don't legally bind him to anything. Anyone in that position would. Jimmy claims this is done so that Comey can later on claim he was 'overconfident' or something. Mind you, Jimmy has seen the video by now, this is not something he's covering live, he knows exactly what Comey has said.
Then the IG says there were 'significant inaccuracies and omissions' in the FISA requests. Fair enough. The IG doesn't say the word 'lie' at all, and in fact the report tagged the inaccuracies and omissions as mistakes but concluded that there was not enough evidence of bias or ill-intent.
But that's not enough for Jimmy! Jimmy needs to make this about LYING and CRIMES even though the IG conclusion is that neither of those things happened. Jimmy then plays the tape of Comey on Wallace (BTW, Wallace does what a real journalist does and repeats there actual wording: 'inaccuracies and omissions') and when Comey says he was overconfident he guffaws as if to tell 'see!? What did I tell you! This fucking guy!', even though he had already seen the tape.
Dore then goes on to blatantly misconstrue the rest of the IG report as if the IG was saying that Comey was a criminal. Again, Wallace - a real journalist - pushes hard on Comey but doesn't imply he's a criminal because he's not an idiot.
In short: Dore makes up a narrative about criminality when at best the report proved incompetence and maybe some malice. Not sure what Dore's angling for - maybe some of that sweet MAGAbot money - but he's gonna get his ass sued if he continues down that path. Look at where Alex is.