Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz says he has the proof.
“But let me just ask you,” said Breitbart News editor Joel Pollack. “You said that George Soros asked Barack Obama to have his Justice Department investigate somebody?”
“We’re — that’s going to come out in a lawsuit in the near future,” responded Alan Dershowitz. “Yeah.”
“Wow, well, we look forward to hearing more about that new. . .”
“That’s not unusual,” Dershowitz said. “People whisper to presidents all the time. Presidents whisper to [the] Justice Department all the time. It’s very common. It’s wrong, whoever does it, but it’s common, and we shouldn’t think that it’s unique to any particular president. I have in my possession the actual 302 form [an FBI record of an interview], which documents this issue, and it will, at the right time, come out. But I’m not free to disclose it now because it’s a case that’s not yet been filed.”
That exchange appeared on Breitbart on Sunday and on Monday was quickly picked up by Lifezette, WND and other independent sites, with one headlining the story “Dershowitz
Blows Up Washington.” The Fox News story appeared about 5 p.m. Monday, but at this writing CNN, MSNBC and the rest of the establishment media have yet to weigh in.
By the end of the day, the target of the Soros-inspired investigation remained unknown. On the other hand, that was hardly the only intrigue surrounding George Soros, described by Pollack as a “billionaire left-wing financier.” As Matthew Vadum noted in the 2016 Frontpage article “Arrest George Soros,” there’s a bit more to the man.
“Soros, the billionaire speculator, is the preeminent funder of the activist Left in America,” Vadum explained, “which means he is the Number One funder of the domestic terrorism that is part and parcel of the Left.” Soros calls America “the main obstacle to a stable and just world order” and says European-style socialism “is exactly what we need.” Soros also funds “open-borders groups in order to corrode the nation’s culture and change its electorate.”
If this “radical ringleader” wants the president of the United States to investigate someone, that is a matter of some concern. In similar style, Soros invites inquiries such as John Solomon’s “US Embassy pressed Ukraine to drop probe of George Soros group during 2016 election,” in The Hill last March.
According to Solomon, the Obama administration pressured the Ukrainian government to back off its investigation of both the U.S. aid and anti-corruption groups such as AntAC. As it turned out, the group Ukrainian law enforcement was probing “was co-funded by the Obama administration and liberal mega-donor George Soros.” And it was collaborating with the FBI agents investigating then-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort.
As Ukrainian officials told Solomon, the message to Ukraine’s prosecutors was clear: “Don’t target AntAC in the middle of an America presidential election in which Soros was backing Hillary Clinton to succeed another Soros favorite, Barack Obama.” After the Obama DOJ launched the Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative, “the State Department, Justice Department and FBI outsourced some of its work in Ukraine to groups funded by Soros.”
On the other hand, consider “The George Soros Conspiracy Theory at the Heart of the Ukraine Scandal,” by Dan Spinelli of the leftist Mother Jones. Soros here emerges a “liberal billionaire” and “a favorite bogeyman on the right due to his support for progressive causes at home and political reforms abroad.” What “turbocharged” Donald Trump’s interest in Ukraine was “specifically, the work of John Solomon” who “authored a series disputed articles about Joe Biden’s activities in Ukraine and Soros’ interactions with Obama administration officials.”
As for conspiracy theories, Spinelli says Solomon is a “longtime client” of Joseph DiGenova’s law firm. No word about the person Soros wanted the Obama DOJ to investigate, and why. Puzzled observers might wonder if POTUS 44 could stand some investigation his own self.
As the late Barry Rubin noted in Silent Revolution: How the Left Rose to Political Power and Cultural Dominance, on Obama’s watch tens of millions of Americans were “turned into anti-Americans.” The goal was “to convince Americans the exact opposite of what their experience proved: that the country had fundamentally failed and the old leftist solutions were the answer.” On the other hand, says Rubin, “not a single serious investigation was conducted about Obama’s earlier life.”
In Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama, official biographer David Garrow, a Pulitzer Prize winner, says the president’s defining Dreams from My Father is a novel and the author a composite character. And after some 800 pages Garrow cites a reporter that the president’s story isn’t exactly true. The novel was something that the former Barry Soetoro and David Axelrod put together, to avoid the “politically radioactive” Communist Frank Marshall Davis, who gets a lot of ink in the Dreams account.
Since Garrow left the key at the back door, we know the truth about the composite character president. We also know that the composite character and George Soros have a similar destructive vision for America. We don’t know the identity of the person Soros wanted the Obama DOJ to investigate, and why. When Alan Dershowitz gets around to filing his lawsuit, that revelation really could blow up Washington.