Priorities and Guidelines Circle, a working group of parents
August 6th, 2020
Too Many Deal Breakers: Why NYC Must Prioritize Safety, Equity, and Compassion
As it stands, there are too many deal breakers preventing the safe, equitable reopening of NYC schools. Until the Department of E ducation and city and state governments can ensure the health and safety of students, teachers, school staff, and their families, including those in the hardest-hit neighborhoods [1] , we must not reopen schools across the board , and must instead focus on funding, infrastructure, and training to meet children’s academic, social, and emotional needs remotely, with key exceptions to address systemic inequities.
Parents and guardians demand that Governor Cuomo, Mayor de Blasio and UFT President Mulgrew:
Why Can’t Most Students Return to School Buildings in September?
Dealbreaker #1: Introducing higher-risk behaviors (e.g., taking public transit, interacting with non-household members indoors, etc.) without the proven capacity for rapid testing and immediate and comprehensive tracing will reverse NYC’s hard-won progress against COVID-19. [5] [6] [7]
Dealbreaker #2: Given recent budget cuts, on top of years of broadscale financial neglect, the DOE does not have the money to pay for the high price-tag, resource-intensive safety measures that hybrid learning plans require. In a life-and-death scenario, cutting corners is not an option.
Dealbreaker #3: School buildings cannot be accurately assessed for safety and made physically ready in time, and the current process is neither transparent nor trustworthy . [8] The same issue holds true for the buses necessary for blended learning to occur, especially that serve the more than 150,000 special education students receiving busing. [9]
Dealbreaker #4: The nurses’, teachers’, principals’, and custodial engineers’ unions have all said that the DOE’s current plans are not sufficient to guarantee safe working or learning conditions. [10] [11] [12] [13]
Dealbreaker #5: By offering the same options to all students, the DOE’s plan does not illustrate how they are going to prioritize the students with the highest needs and those most impacted by systemic inequities. [14]
Dealbreaker #6: Remote learning will be a reality most of the time for a vast majority of our students, as even those who select "blended" in the current plan could be in person as little as 20%. of the time. Yet the DOE is primarily focused on planning in-person logistics, which wastes scarce time, energy, and resources. [15]
Dealbreaker #7: NYC does not have sealed borders, so it cannot escape the larger public health crisis that our nation faces. There are 13 states that should be issuing stay-at-home orders, but are unlikely to do so. [16] Even within New York City, i n July, many neighborhoods were reporting infection rates above or close to the mayor's 3% threshold. For instance, several neighborhoods in the Bronx had July infection rates over 5%. [17]
Reality Check : Experts predict that in-person learning, with its numerous rules and vulnerability to closure, will not provide the return to school that everyone is longing for. [18] This is not going to be a positive experience for children, teachers, or parents when we consider the social consequences of the health and safety directives. Consider: When a child is put in the isolation room, how are the staff trained to handle explaining that? How are parents expected to handle the emotions of the child sent home? How will the community deal with bullying, blame, guilt, and judgment? When we add in the risk that beloved teachers or family members might become ill or die, it’s clear that no solution is without risk of trauma. [19] [20] The truth is, in-person school only one or two days each week fails at its three stated goals:
THE GOVERNOR, MAYOR, AND CHANCELLOR NEED TO CHANGE COURSE NOW.
TO ADDRESS THE URGENCY OF THE CURRENT MOMENT,
CANCEL IN-PERSON INSTRUCTION & DO THESE VERY IMPORTANT THINGS:
This position paper is a labor of love and collaboration of the Priorities and Guidelines Circle, a small group within Back to School Safely NY who came together to prioritize a safe, sensible, equitable, intersectional and inspired reopening of NYC public schools based on science. We will be adding to and revising as we learn new information, but we hope the essence of our views is clear. If you would like to help us translate this into other languages, or for any other inquiries, please reach out to us at prioritize.safe.equity@gmail.com
We would love to know what you think . Want to join our efforts? Fill out this form to let us know.
If what we have written resonates, please share it with all of the families that you can, use it on social media, and/or any time you have an opportunity to speak truth to power. We are @safeschoolsny on twitter, instagram, and facebook.
Also, if you want to learn more about the science of reopening schools, check out What does the SCIENCE say? , a pare nt-planned event that took place on August 6th, featuring Danielle C. Ompad, Phd an infectious disease expert tasked with the safe reopening of NYU, Kaliris Y. Salas-Ramirez, Phd a neurologist who discussed the neurological impacts on socio-emotional health and the impact of staying home, Prof. Jorge E. Gonzales, PhD FASM who explained what we need to know about airborne transmission and Cristina M. Gonzalez, MD, MEd who walked us through the differences in health impacts within urban communities of color. Moderated by Rashida Abuwala, the director of the Redlich Horwitz Foundation and a parent of a proud public ed student.
[1] Data Check: Recent COVID-19 Infection Rates Vary Widely By Neighborhood
[2] We aren’t the only ones. Have you seen MORE’s petition ?
[3] Remote is not and will never be what in-person learning can be in non-COVID times. We reject Cuomo’s fantasy that schools will use distance learning in bigger ways in the future.
[4] Some Students Should Go to School, Most Should Stay Home
[5] 9-Day Waits for Test Results Threaten N.Y.C.’s Ability to Contain Virus
[6] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/29/nyregion/new-york-contact-tracing.html
[8] “When we asked about ventilation, we were told by the Dept. of School Facilities that having our windows and doors open would be “safe” and “adequate”. Yet, we’ve had no assessment from an independent environmental engineer or DOE official to determine this. At no point have we been given any scientific or quantifiable data about how the determination was made that our airflow situation is adequate.”(Anonymous Brooklyn School Administrator)
[9] 150,000 NYC families who rely on yellow school buses wait for answers on transportation plans
[10] If you really want to make your head spin check out the questions the union sent the DOE on July 23rd.
[11] Teachers union prepared to fight if NYC forces schools to reopen
[12] If there is evidence that we shouldn't reopen generally, why would we put families at further risk by reopening schools prematurely?
[13] Officials Promise NYC Schools Will Be Cleaned Constantly When They Reopen. Custodians Wonder How
[14] Bklyner Data Check: Recent COVID-19 Infection Rates Vary Widely By Neighborhood
[15] How Can Schools Open Safely This Fall?
[16] Key Metrics for COVID Suppression
[17] Bklyner Data Check: Recent COVID-19 Infection Rates Vary Widely By Neighborhood
[18] I n-person learning, with the necessary safety measures in place will not provide any of these as well as our schools were able to in years past. Ironically, a well designed lesson in a remote context might allow for more conversation and collaboration that will be possible in-person, “The models rely on unrealistic, developmentally inappropriate expectations of social-distancing and mask-wearing that, while necessary for containing COVID-19, are impossible and unethical to enforce for very young children and for those with special needs.” Parents and Teachers Agree: It Is Too Soon To Go Back into School Buildings
[19] We have also paid a lot of lip service to our deeper appreciation for how difficult it is to teach. Now is not the time to show that appreciation by asking teachers to teach in a context that poses risks to them and their loved ones. It’s no coincidence that many, many teachers plan to select remote only learning for their children. They don’t think schools will be safe. Ruth on Twitter: "I hope parents are keeping an eye on the decisions teachers are making for their own kids in @NYCSchools. Many are choosing to keep their children learning remotely, even though we have to be in the building. that's bc we know what schools will be like."
[20] Open schools, risk our health
[21] Parents and Teachers Agree: It Is Too Soon To Go Back into School Buildings
[22] Some Students Should Go to School, Most Should Stay Home
[23] The DOE needs to also ready school hubs that can serve our most vulnerable children asap. Some Students Should Go to School, Most Should Stay Home
[24] AQE, Alliance for Quality Education: A Roadmap to A Just Reopening & Just Schools
[26] Some Students Should Go to School, Most Should Stay Home
[28] AQE, Alliance for Quality Education: A Roadmap to A Just Reopening & Just Schools
[29] NYC councilors ask Albany to support another cancellation of state tests