Evidence Stats on the 2020 Election | Here Is The Evidence

2020 ELECTION EVIDENTIARY STATS

Ballots Touched By Admissible Anomalies

Courts Blocked an Evidentiary Hearing

1. Witnesses in past contested elections

2. The Court or Election Board's response:

FL Presidential 2000:

MO 78th District 2016:

NC 9th District 2018:

NY 22nd District 2020:

GA Presidential 2020:

MI Presidential 2020:

PA Presidential 2020:

EVIDENTIARY HEARING

EVIDENTIARY HEARING

EVIDENTIARY HEARING

EVIDENTIARY HEARING

NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING

NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING

NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING

FL Presidential 2000:

MO 78th District 2016:

NC 9th District 2018:

NY 22nd District 2020:

GA Presidential 2020:

MI Presidential 2020:

PA Presidential 2020:

RECOUNT/AUDIT

NEW ELECTION

NEW ELECTION

ACTIVE TRIAL

NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING

NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING

NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING

4. Witness testimony accounts for upwards of 90% of evidence in evidentiary hearings.

5. No election contest in American history has had 923 citizens stake their personal freedom on sworn testimony to attest to irregularities and legal issues.

6. When an election lawsuit is dismissed, it is blocked from having an evidentiary hearing, thus preventing the evidence from being presented in a court of law.

7. Georgia did have two recounts that used similar procedures to the original count and did not address the legal issues brought by fact witnesses, nor follow the U.S. Election Assistance Commission guidelines.

Fact List: BALLOT INTEGRITY PROCEDURES

4. The altered Ballot Integrity Procedures reduced the rate of illegal ballots caught by Officials this election.

5. With the same Ballot Integrity Procedures as 2018, swing states would have found upwards of 30x more illegal ballots.

6. Vice President Biden’s margin of victory in 4 swing states appears to rely on the altered Ballot Integrity Procedures these states enacted for this election.

7. Vice President Biden would not maintain his victory in 2 (possibly 4) swing states if the Ballot Integrity Procedures were the same as 2018.

8. A court in Arizon had two handwriting expert witnesses evaluated the signatures on 100 random absentee ballots.

9. The Republican expert witness found 6% of signatures on the 100 ballots where problematic.

10. The Democrat expert witness found 9% of signatures on the 100 ballots where problematic.

11. Vice President Biden would likely not maintain his victory in Arizona if the Ballot Integrity Procedures had caught the estimated problematic ballots.

Biden's Arizona Margin of Victory vs. Estimated Problematic Absentee Ballots