Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Please note there is a new rule regarding the posting of videos. It reads, "Post a summary of the videos you post . An exception can be made for music videos.". Unless you are simply sharing music, please post a summary, or the gist, of the video you wish to share.
There have been some changes in the Life Stages section involving the following forums: Roaring 20s, Terrific Thirties, Fabulous Forties, and Golden Eagles. They are changed to Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, and Golden Eagles will have a slight change.
CF Staff, Angels and Ambassadors; ask that you join us in praying for the world in this difficult time, asking our Holy Father to stop the spread of the virus, and for healing of all affected.
We are no longer allowing posts or threads that deny the existence of Covid-19. Members have lost loved ones to this virus and are grieving. As a Christian site, we do not need to add to the pain of the loss by allowing posts that deny the existence of the virus that killed their loved one. Future post denying the Covid-19 existence, calling it a hoax, will be addressed via the warning system.
It seems from a quick scan of readings including the Bible, Adam was a hermaphrodite.
What do you think?
Ozymandius said:
Because I actually have a SOURCE for my beliefs! That's why. There is no source that even remotely suggests that Adam was a hermaphrodite. The idea is taken out of thin air and is totally ridiculous.Highly ironic comming from someone who belives in talking donkeys and magical, 2000 year old carpenters. Why should it be any more crazy to suggest adam was a hermaphrodite or whatever, considering he didnt exist, at least not in a literal sense?
Click to expand...
But I think the OP knows this.![]()
SackLunch said:
All the other people to ever believe in any god that ever existed had a source for their beliefs. You are no different.Because I actually have a SOURCE for my beliefs! That's why. There is no source that even remotely suggests that Adam was a hermaphrodite. The idea is taken out of thin air and is totally ridiculous.
But I think the OP knows this.
![]()
Click to expand...
Kris_J said:
Umm...I'd hate to be bothersome, but would you mind explaining how you came to this conclusion and what parts of the Bible you scanned?It seems from a quick scan of readings including the Bible, Adam was a hermaphrodite.
What do you think?Click to expand...
Hydra009 said:
Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply,...Umm...I'd hate to be bothersome, but would you mind explaining how you came to this conclusion and what parts of the Bible you scanned?
Click to expand...
Kris_J said:
Always thought "image" was supposed to mean "spiritual image". Or do you think God is a bipedal primate?Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply,...
Click to expand...
Kris_J said:
You know about the whole "adam" and "adamah" pun, right?Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply,...
This is before God created "Eve" - so how were the Adam(s) to multiply?Click to expand...
A hebrew scholar could do a much better job, but here's the jist:
ADAM - אדם
ADAMAH (ground) - אדםה
[Bible]Genesis 2:7[/Bible]
It can also be read: And the LORD God formed ADAM out of the ADAMAH. Get the dual meaning?
---
Anyway, the point is a lot is lost in the translation, and looking at a word used both as mankind in general and a single individual in a poetic fashion for a biological description misses the point of the passage.
And just to be clear, you're aware of the whole Documentary Hypothesis thing and the Priestly Source of the multiple occurances of "be fruitful and mutilply" in Genesis?
Kris_J said:
I don't think this conclusion is necessary. As an allegorical "history" intended to impart morals and to counter polytheistic religions prevailant in the culture, Genesis isn't intended to be either a literal account, nor was it intended to portray a literal timeline.Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply,...
Click to expand...
Either way, if Adam was a hermaphrodite, that would have serious implications. I mean, I could never look at myself in the mirror again!I don't think this conclusion is necessary. As an allegorical "history" intended to impart morals and to counter polytheistic religions prevailant in the culture, Genesis isn't intended to be either a literal account, nor was it intended to portray a literal timeline.
Click to expand...
![]()
RoboMastodon said:
What if it can be found that the Bible implies that Adam was a hermaphrodite - & if scientific evidence shows that the earliest primates were hermaphrodites?Always thought "image" was supposed to mean "spiritual image". Or do you think God is a bipedal primate?
Click to expand...
Apparently Greek mythology speaks of first humans (hermaphrodite) being split into male & female by Zeus.
SackLunch said:
Why is it ridiculous? Do you believe that in the literal Creation, all animals, plants & humans were only either male or female?Because I actually have a SOURCE for my beliefs! That's why. There is no source that even remotely suggests that Adam was a hermaphrodite. The idea is taken out of thin air and is totally ridiculous.
But I think the OP knows this.
![]()
Click to expand...
Kris_J, it would be very surprising (and likely damaging to the theory of evolution) if early primates acquired the trait of normally being hermaphrodites well after the time and cladistic catagorization where distinct sexual differentiation was acquired and then for every currently living primate to have lost it.
madarab said:
Hermaphrodites still exist today in both humans & primates, though not very common. Other animal species however can be hermaphrodites, & some are hermaphrodites/one gender at one stage in life & evolve to another gender later in life.Kris_J, it would be very surprising (and likely damaging to the theory of evolution) if early primates acquired the trait of normally being hermaphrodites well after the time and cladistic catagorization where distinct sexual differentiation was acquired and then for every currently living primate to have lost it.
Click to expand...
Mistermystery said:
Thanks .... But I wonder if this topic is merely uninteresting or too scary to consider...Thread delivers.
Click to expand...
![]()
It's hillarious, that's what it is.
Kris_J said:
I can see that. But I think Gen. 2:23 is a much stronger argument:Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply,...
Click to expand...
"This one shall be called Woman for out of Man this one was taken."
It is interesting as well, that everywhere else in the chapter the individual created in Gen. 2:7 is called 'adam', a generic term for 'human'. But the word translated as "Man" in vs. 23 is 'ish' which refers specifically to human who is male as 'ishah' (Woman) refers to a human who is female.
Are we dealing with the Hebrew equivalent of the Greek story of the creation of humanity, which also suggests the first humans were hermaphrodites until they were divided by the gods into male and female halves?
Mistermystery said:
Its in support of theistic evolution - Does it put your atheistic evolution view in danger since you haven't given any proper response?It's hillarious, that's what it is.
Click to expand...
Kris_J said:
or just pretty dumbThanks .... But I wonder if this topic is merely uninteresting or too scary to consider...
![]()
Click to expand...