Moe Factz 50 - "Class Action"

Moe Factz with Adam Curry for October 3d 2020, Episode number 50
"Class Action"
Description
  Adam and Moe provide an on-ramp to the show, with a detailed breakdown of ADOS, reparations and how we got here only to repeat much of history
Download the mp3
Executive Producers:
  Baron HeyIdiot
  Sir Dude Named Matt
  Steven Page
  James Turner
  David I McAnally
  No Agenda Dame Jay of the Angry Clouds
  Chisum Cooke
  Timothy Witteveen
  William Sola
  Frankie Tea
Associate Executive Producers:
  Neil Bottomley
  Connor Lawrence
  Erik Höchel
  James McClain
  Josiah Hendrickson
  Sir Nathan Lee
  Dennis Weirick
  Miss Jay
  John Taylor
  Sir Economic Hitman, Baron of Congressional Dish
  Douglas Mook
  Donna Blanchard
  Keith and Tressa H
  Paul Arseneault
  szymon libuszewski
  Ella Leiblein
  Dame Jennifer Buchanan
  Rollie Hawk
  Sarah Halstead
  Kris Malmi
  Michael Olsen
  Jon Cornforth
  Daniel Webb
  daniel hunt
  Cody Gray
  David Weed
Episode 50 Club Members
  James McClain
  Josiah Hendrickson
  Sir Nathan Lee
  Dennis Weirick
  Miss Jay
  John Taylor
  Sir Economic Hitman, Baron of Congressional Dish
  Douglas Mook
  Donna Blanchard
  Keith and Tressa H
  Paul Arseneault
  szymon libuszewski
  Ella Leiblein
  Dame Jennifer Buchanan
  Rollie Hawk
  Sarah Halstead
  Kris Malmi
  Michael Olsen
  Jon Cornforth
  Daniel Webb
  daniel hunt
  Cody Gray
  David Weed
ShowNotes
  Lincoln's House Divided Speech - Wikipedia
    Link to Article
    Archived Version
    Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:51
    "House divided" redirects here. For the episode of the TV series House, see
    House Divided.
    Abraham Lincoln in May 1858
    The House Divided Speech was an address given by Abraham Lincoln, later President of the United States, on June 16, 1858, at what was then the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield, after he had accepted the Illinois Republican Party's nomination as that state's US senator. The nomination of Lincoln was the final item of business at the convention, which then broke for dinner, meeting again at 8 PM. "The evening session was mainly devoted to speeches",[1] but the only speaker was Lincoln, whose address closed the convention, save for resolutions of thanks to the city of Springfield and others. His address was immediately published in full by newspapers,[2][3][4] as a pamphlet,[5] and in the published Proceedings of the convention.[6] It was the launching point of his unsuccessful campaign for the Senatorial seat held by Stephen A. Douglas; the campaign would climax with the Lincoln''Douglas debates. When Lincoln collected and published his debates with Douglas as part of his 1860 Presidential campaign, he prefixed them with relevant prior speeches. The "House Divided" speech opens the volume.[7]
    Lincoln's remarks in Springfield depict the danger of slavery-based disunion, and it rallied Republicans across the North. Along with the Gettysburg Address and his Second Inaugural Address, the speech became one of the best-known of his career. It begins with the following words, which became the best-known passage of the speech:[8]
    "A house divided against itself, cannot stand."
    I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.
    I do not expect the Union to be dissolved '-- I do not expect the house to fall '-- but I do expect it will cease to be divided.
    It will become all one thing or all the other.
    Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become lawful in all the States, old as well as new '-- North as well as South.[6]: 9
    Lincoln's goals were to differentiate himself from Douglas '-- the incumbent '-- and to voice a prophecy publicly. Douglas had long advocated popular sovereignty, under which the settlers in each new territory would decide their own status as a slave or free state; he had repeatedly asserted that the proper application of popular sovereignty would prevent slavery-induced conflict and would allow Northern and Southern states to resume their peaceful coexistence. Lincoln, however, responded that the Dred Scott decision had closed the door on Douglas's preferred option, leaving the Union with only two remaining outcomes: the country would inevitably become either all slave or all free. Now that the North and the South had come to hold distinct opinions in the question of slavery, and now the issue had come to permeate every other political question, the Union would soon no longer be able to function.
    Quotes [ edit ] "A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved'--I do not expect the house to fall'--but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery, will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the states, old as well as new'--North as well as South. Have we no tendency to the latter condition? Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination'-- piece of machinery so to speak'--compounded of the Nebraska doctrine, and the Dred Scott decision.The Kansas-Nebraska Act opened all the national territory to slavery .... This ... had been provided for ... in the notable argument of "squatter sovereignty," otherwise called "sacred right of self government," which latter phrase, though expressive of the only rightful basis of any government, was so perverted in this attempted use of it as to amount to just this: That if any one man, choose to enslave another, no third man shall be allowed to object.While the Nebraska Bill was passing through Congress, a law case, involving the question of a negro's freedom ... was passing through the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri; and both Nebraska Bill and lawsuit were brought to a decision in the same month of May, 1854. The Negro's name was "Dred Scott" ....[The points decided by the "Dred Scott" decision include] that whether the holding a negro in actual slavery in a free state, makes him free, as against the holder, the United States courts will not decide, but will leave to be decided by the courts of any slave state the negro may be forced into by the master. This point is made, not to be pressed immediately ... [that] the logical conclusion that what Dred Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free state Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with any other one, or one thousand slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free state.While the opinion of ... Chief Justice Taney, in the Dred Scott case ... expressly declare[s] that the Constitution of the United States neither permits congress nor a territorial legislature to exclude slavery from any United States territory, ... [Taney] omit[s] to declare whether or not the same constitution permits a state, or the people of a state, to exclude it. Possibly, this was a mere omission; but who can be quite sure ....The nearest approach to the point of declaring the power of a state over slavery, is made by Judge Nelson. He approaches it more than once, using the precise idea, and almost the language too, of the Nebraska Act. On one occasion his exact language is, "except in cases where the power is restrained by the Constitution of the United States, the law of the State is supreme over the subject of slavery within its jurisdiction." In what cases the power of the states is so restrained by the U.S. Constitution, is left an open question, precisely as the same question, as to the restraint on the power of the territories was left open in the Nebraska Act. Put that and that together, and we have another nice little niche, which we may, ere long, see filled with another Supreme Court decision, declaring that the Constitution of the United States does not permit a state to exclude slavery from its limits. And this may especially be expected if the doctrine of "care not whether slavery be voted down or voted up" shall gain upon the public mind sufficiently to give promise that such a decision can be maintained when made.
    Such a decision is all that slavery now lacks of being alike lawful in all the States. Welcome, or unwelcome, such decision is probably coming, and will soon be upon us, unless the power of the present political dynasty shall be met and overthrown. We shall lie down pleasantly dreaming that the people of Missouri are on the verge of making their State free, and we shall awake to the reality instead that the Supreme Court has made Illinois a slave state. Prior mentions of "a house divided" [ edit ] Early Christians:
    The expression "a house divided against itself" appears twice in the Bible. In the Gospel of Mark 3:25, Jesus states, "And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand." That is in response to the scribes' claim that "by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils."[9] In the Gospel of Matthew 12:25, "Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto him, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand" (King James version).Saint Augustine, in his Confessions (Book 8, Chapter 8) describes his conversion experience as being "a house divided against itself."It also appears in widely-read English writers:
    Thomas Hobbes, in his 1651 Leviathan (Chapter 18), states that "a kingdom divided in itself cannot stand."In Thomas Paine's 1776 Common Sense, he describes the composition of the English constitution "hath all the distinctions of a house divided against itself. ... "In the United States:
    During the War of 1812 a line appeared in a letter from Abigail Adams to Mercy Otis Warren: "... A house divided upon itself - and upon that foundation do our enemies build their hopes of subduing us."[10]Felix Walker, in his speech for Buncombe, on the Missouri Compromise, said, "And we have the word of truth for it, that a house divided against itself cannot stand."[11]The "house divided" phrase had been used by Lincoln himself in another context in 1843.[12]Famously, eight years before Lincoln's speech, during the Senate debate on the Compromise of 1850, Sam Houston had proclaimed: "A nation divided against itself cannot stand."However and most relevantly, the expression was used repeatedly earlier in 1858 in discussions of the situation in Kansas, where slavery was the central issue.
    It was used editorially in the Brooklyn Evening Star of January 8,[13] the New York Daily Herald on January 12,[14] and the Alton Weekly Telegraph of January 28.[15]It appeared, in quotation marks, in a letter to the editor published in The Liberator on April 23.[16] (Lincoln certainly received The Liberator, as it was sent free to all prominent politicians outside the South (subsidized by benefactors), but it is not known if or how much he read it.)See also [ edit ] Abraham Lincoln on slaveryOrigins of the American Civil WarReferences [ edit ] ^ "Republican Convention". The Pantagraph (Bloomington, Illinois). June 18, 1858. p. 2 '' via newspapers.com. ^ "Conclusion of the Republican State Convention. Speech of Hon. Abraham Lincoln". Chicago Tribune. June 19, 1858. p. 2. ^ "Republican principles. Speech of Hon. Abraham Lincoln, of Illinois, at the Republican state Convention, June 16, 1858". New-York Tribune. June 24, 1858. p. 3 '' via newspapers.com. ^ "Speech of Hon. Abraham Lincoln". Alton Weekly Telegraph (Alton, Illinois). June 24, 1858. p. 2 '' via newspapers.com. ^ Lincoln, Abraham (1858). Speech of Hon. Abram [sic] Lincoln before the Republican state convention, June 16, 1858. OCLC 2454620. ^ a b Proceedings of the Republican state convention, held at Springfield, Illinois, June 16th, 1858. Springfield, Illinois. 1858. ^ Lincoln, Abraham; Douglas, Stephen A. (1860). Political Debates between Hon. Abraham Lincoln and Hon. Stephen A. Douglas, In the Celebrated Campaign of 1858, in Illinois; including the preceding speeches of each, at Chicago, Springfield, etc.; also, the two great speeches of Mr. Lincoln in Ohio, in 1859, as carefully prepared by the reporters of each party, and published at the times of their delivery. Columbus, Ohio: Follett, Foster and Company. pp. 1''5. ^ Foner, Eric (2010). The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery. pp. 99''100. ISBN 978-0-393-06618-0. ^ "Mark 3:25". Bible Gateway. ^ David Kennedy, Lizabeth Cohen, Thomas Bailey: The American Pageant: Volume I: To 1877, p. 253. ^ "Missouri Question: Speech of Mr. Walker, of N.C." City of Washington Gazette, 5/11/1820, Vol. V, Iss. 759, p. [2]. ^ Address to the people of Illinois, in Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, I, p. 315 ^ "Organization of the American General Committee". Brooklyn Evening Star (Brooklyn, New York). January 8, 1858. p. 2 '' via newspapers.com. ^ "Kansas in Congress'--The Decisive Issue upon the Slavery Question". New York Daily Herald. January 12, 1858. p. 4 '' via newspapers.com. ^ "Democratic Disunion". Alton Weekly Telegraph (Alton, Illinois). January 28, 1858. p. 1 '' via newspapers.com. ^ W. (April 23, 1858). "The Foul Anchor". The Liberator '' via newspapers.com. Further reading [ edit ] Fehrenbacher, Don E. (1960). "The Origins and Purpose of Lincoln's 'House-Divided' Speech". Mississippi Valley Historical Review. 46 (4): 615''643. doi:10.2307/1886280. External links [ edit ] Works related to A house divided at Wikisource"Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Volume 2". quod.lib.umich.edu. Complete Text of 'Lincoln's House Divided Speech'
  Lincoln to slaves: go somewhere else '' Pieces of History
    Link to Article
    Archived Version
    Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:44
    Today's post comes from National Archives Office of Strategy and Communications staff writer Rob Crotty.
    DC Emancipation Act, April 1862 showing money to be set aside for deportation (ARC 299814)The issue of slavery divided the country under Abraham Lincoln's Presidency. The national argument was simple: either keep slavery or abolish it. But Abraham Lincoln, known as the Great Emancipator, may have also been known as the Great Colonizer when he supported a third direction to the slavery debate: move African Americans somewhere else.
    Long before the Civil War, in 1854, Lincoln addressed his own solution to slavery at a speech delivered in Peoria, Illinois: ''I should not know what to do as to the existing institution [of slavery]. My first impulse would be to free all the slaves, and send them to Liberia, to their own native land.'' While Lincoln acknowledged this was logistically impossible, by the time he assumed the Presidency and a Civil War was underfoot, the nation was in such duress that he tried it anyway.
    By early 1861, Lincoln ordered a secret trip to modern-day Panama to investigate the land of a Philadelphian named Ambrose Thompson. Thompson had volunteered his Chiriqui land as a refuge for freed slaves. The slaves would work in the abundant coal mines on his property, the coal would be sold to the Navy, and the profits would go to the freed slaves to further build up their new land.
    Lincoln sought to test the idea on the small slave population in Delaware, but the idea met fierce opposition from abolitionists when it went public.
    In April 1862, Lincoln was still of the mind that emancipation and deportation was the key to a peaceful United States. He supported a bill in Congress that provided money
    ''to be expended under the direction of the President of the United States, to aid in the colonization and settlement of such free persons of African descent now residing in said District, including those to be liberated by this act, as may desire to emigrate to the Republic of Haiti or Liberia, or such other country beyond the limits of the United States as the President may determine.''
    This would become the final portion of the DC Emancipation Act.
    In August of 1862, Lincoln invited five prominent black men to the White House, the first black delegation invited on such terms. The topic was simple, that white and blacks cannot coexist and that separation is the most expedient means to peace. Lincoln encouraged these five men to rally support for an exodus.
    This intent is even echoed in the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation: '''... that the effort to colonize persons of African descent, with their consent, upon this continent, or elsewhere'... will be continued.''
    Near this same time, the results of Lincoln's investigation into the Chiriqui lands proved the coal there was worthless, and there was also the small matter that Costa Rica claimed ownership of part of Thompson's land.
    The next area considered was a small island off the coast of Haiti. About 450 blacks were sent to the island, but after only a year, nearly 25% had died due to poor nutrition and disease. The remainder were returned to the states.
    By 1863, realizing Liberia, Haiti, and the Chiriqui lands were not reasonable for resettlement (Liberia was considered too great a distance to relocate a large number of freed slaves), Lincoln mentioned moving the ''whole colored race of the slave states into Texas.''
    Four days before his death, speaking to Gen. Benjamin Butler, Lincoln still pressed on with deportation as the only peaceable solution to America's race problem. ''I can hardly believe that the South and North can live in peace, unless we can get rid of the negroes '... I believe that it would be better to export them all to some fertile country'...''
    Of course this would not happen. Throughout reconstruction, Jim Crow laws, and eventually the Civil Rights Act, the country struggled for the next century to settle the problem of race''one it still struggles with today''though today the US is made stronger, not weaker, by its diversity.
    For more on Lincoln and the island country of Haiti, join us tomorrow at the William G. McGowan Theater at 7 pm as a panel of experts discusses ''Lincoln and Haiti: Colonization and Haitian Recognition During the Civil War.''
  The Emancipation Proclamation | National Archives
    Link to Article
    Archived Version
    Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:42
    President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, as the nation approached its third year of bloody civil war. The proclamation declared "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforward shall be free."
    Despite this expansive wording, the Emancipation Proclamation was limited in many ways. It applied only to states that had seceded from the United States, leaving slavery untouched in the loyal border states. It also expressly exempted parts of the Confederacy (the Southern secessionist states) that had already come under Northern control. Most important, the freedom it promised depended upon Union (United States) military victory.
    Although the Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the nation, it captured the hearts and imagination of millions of Americans and fundamentally transformed the character of the war. After January 1, 1863, every advance of federal troops expanded the domain of freedom. Moreover, the Proclamation announced the acceptance of black men into the Union Army and Navy, enabling the liberated to become liberators. By the end of the war, almost 200,000 black soldiers and sailors had fought for the Union and freedom.
    From the first days of the Civil War, slaves had acted to secure their own liberty. The Emancipation Proclamation confirmed their insistence that the war for the Union must become a war for freedom. It added moral force to the Union cause and strengthened the Union both militarily and politically. As a milestone along the road to slavery's final destruction, the Emancipation Proclamation has assumed a place among the great documents of human freedom.
    The original of the Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1863, is in the National Archives in Washington, DC. With the text covering five pages the document was originally tied with narrow red and blue ribbons, which were attached to the signature page by a wafered impression of the seal of the United States. Most of the ribbon remains; parts of the seal are still decipherable, but other parts have worn off.
    The document was bound with other proclamations in a large volume preserved for many years by the Department of State. When it was prepared for binding, it was reinforced with strips along the center folds and then mounted on a still larger sheet of heavy paper. Written in red ink on the upper right-hand corner of this large sheet is the number of the Proclamation, 95, given to it by the Department of State long after it was signed. With other records, the volume containing the Emancipation Proclamation was transferred in 1936 from the Department of State to the National Archives of the United States.
    The Emancipation ProclamationSelect Resources Transcript of the Proclamation The Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, 1862 "The Emancipation Proclamation: An Act of Justice" by John Hope Franklin. The Charters of Freedom
  Cotton gin - Wikipedia
    Link to Article
    Archived Version
    Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:28
    Machine that separates cotton fibers from seeds
    A cotton gin '' meaning "cotton engine" '' is a machine that quickly and easily separates cotton fibers from their seeds, enabling much greater productivity than manual cotton separation.[1] The fibers are then processed into various cotton goods such as calico, while any undamaged cotton is used largely for textiles like clothing. The separated seeds may be used to grow more cotton or to produce cottonseed oil.
    Handheld roller gins had been used in the Indian subcontinent since at earliest AD 500 and then in other regions.[2] The Indian worm-gear roller gin, invented sometime around the 16th century,[3] has, according to Lakwete, remained virtually unchanged up to the present time. A modern mechanical cotton gin was created by American inventor Eli Whitney in 1793 and patented in 1794.
    Whitney's gin used a combination of a wire screen and small wire hooks to pull the cotton through, while brushes continuously removed the loose cotton lint to prevent jams. It revolutionized the cotton industry in the United States, but also led to the growth of slavery in the American South as the demand for cotton workers rapidly increased. The invention has thus been identified as an inadvertent contributing factor to the outbreak of the American Civil War.[4] Modern automated cotton gins use multiple powered cleaning cylinders and saws, and offer far higher productivity than their hand-powered precursors.[5]
    Eli Whitney with the help of Catharine Greene invented his cotton gin in 1793. He began to work on this project after moving to Georgia in search of work, given that farmers were desperately searching for a way to make cotton farming profitable.
    History [ edit ] "The First Cotton Gin", an engraving from
    Harper's Magazine, 1869. This carving depicts a roller gin being used by enslaved Americans, which preceded Eli Whitney's invention.
    [6]A single-roller cotton gin came into use in India by the 5th century. An improvement invented in India was the two-roller gin, known as the "churka", "charki", or "wooden-worm-worked roller".[7]
    Purpose [ edit ] Cotton fibers are produced in the seed pods ("bolls") of the cotton plant where the fibers ("lint") in the bolls are tightly interwoven with seeds. To make the fibers usable, the seeds and fibers must first be separated, a task which had been previously performed manually, with production of cotton requiring hours of labor for the separation. Many simple seed-removing devices had been invented, but until the innovation of the cotton gin, most required significant operator attention and worked only on a small scale.[8]
    Early cotton gins [ edit ] The earliest versions of the cotton gin consisted of a single roller made of iron or wood and a flat piece of stone or wood. The earliest evidence of the cotton gin is found in the fifth century, in the form of Buddhist paintings depicting a single-roller gin in the Ajanta Caves in western India.[2] These early gins were difficult to use and required a great deal of skill. A narrow single roller was necessary to expel the seeds from the cotton without crushing the seeds. The design was similar to that of a mealing stone, which was used to grind grain. The early history of the cotton gin is ambiguous, because archeologists likely mistook the cotton gin's parts for other tools.[2]
    Between the 12th and 14th centuries, dual-roller gins appeared in India and China. The Indian version of the dual-roller gin was prevalent throughout the Mediterranean cotton trade by the 16th century. This mechanical device was, in some areas, driven by water power.[9]
    Mughal India [ edit ] The worm gear roller gin, which was invented in the Indian subcontinent during the early Delhi Sultanate era of the 13th to 14th centuries, came into use in the Mughal Empire sometime around the 16th century,[10] and is still used in the Indian subcontinent through to the present day.[2] Another innovation, the incorporation of the crank handle in the cotton gin, first appeared sometime during the late Delhi Sultanate or the early Mughal Empire.[11] The incorporation of the worm gear and crank handle into the roller cotton gin led to greatly expanded Indian cotton textile production during the Mughal era.[12]
    It was reported that, with an Indian cotton gin, which is half machine and half tool, one man and one woman could clean 28 pounds of cotton per day. With a modified Forbes version, one man and a boy could produce 250 pounds per day. If oxen were used to power 16 of these machines, and a few people's labour was used to feed them, they could produce as much work as 750 people did formerly.[13]
    United States [ edit ] The Indian roller cotton gin, known as the churka or charkha, was introduced to the United States in the mid-18th century, when it was adopted in the southern United States. The device was adopted for cleaning long-staple cotton, but was not suitable for the short-staple cotton that was more common in certain states such as Georgia. Several modifications were made to the Indian roller gin by Mr. Krebs in 1772 and Joseph Eve in 1788, but their uses remained limited to the long-staple variety, up until Eli Whitney's development of a short-staple cotton gin in 1793.[14]
    Eli Whitney's patent [ edit ] Eli Whitney's original cotton gin patent, dated March 14, 1794
    Eli Whitney (1765''1825) applied for a patent of his cotton gin on October 28, 1793; the patent was granted on March 14, 1794, but was not validated until 1807. Whitney's patent was assigned patent number 72X.[15] There is slight controversy over whether the idea of the modern cotton gin and its constituent elements are correctly attributed to Eli Whitney. The popular image of Whitney inventing the cotton gin is attributed to an article on the subject written in the early 1870s and later reprinted in 1910 in The Library of Southern Literature. In this article, the author claimed Catharine Littlefield Greene suggested to Whitney the use of a brush-like component instrumental in separating out the seeds and cotton. To date, Greene's role in the invention of the gin has not been verified independently.[16]
    Whitney's cotton gin model was capable of cleaning 50 pounds (23 kg) of lint per day. The model consisted of a wooden cylinder surrounded by rows of slender spikes, which pulled the lint through the bars of a comb-like grid.[17] The grids were closely spaced, preventing the seeds from passing through. Loose cotton was brushed off, preventing the mechanism from jamming.
    Many contemporary inventors attempted to develop a design that would process short staple cotton, and Hodgen Holmes, Robert Watkins, William Longstreet, and John Murray had all been issued patents for improvements to the cotton gin by 1796.[18] However, the evidence indicates Whitney did invent the saw gin, for which he is famous. Although he spent many years in court attempting to enforce his patent against planters who made unauthorized copies, a change in patent law ultimately made his claim legally enforceable '' too late for him to make much money from the device in the single year remaining before the patent expired.[19]
    McCarthy's gin [ edit ] While Whitney's gin facilitated the cleaning of seeds from short-staple cotton, it damaged the fibers of extra-long staple cotton (Gossypium barbadense). In 1840 Fones McCarthy received a patent for a "Smooth Cylinder Cotton-gin", a roller gin. McCarthy's gin was marketed for use with both short-staple and extra-long staple cotton, but was particularly useful for processing long-staple cotton. After McCarthy's patent expired in 1861, McCarthy type gins were manufactured in Britain and sold around the world.[20] McCarthy's gin was adopted for cleaning the Sea Island variety of extra-long staple cotton grown in Florida, Georgia and South Carolina. It cleaned cotton several times faster than the older gins, and, when powered by one horse, produced 150 to 200 pounds of lint a day.[21] The McCarthy gin used a reciprocating knife to detach seed from the lint. Vibration caused by the reciprocating motion limited the speed at which the gin could operate. In the middle of the 20th Century gins using a rotating blade replaced ones using a reciprocating blade. These descendants of the McCarthy gin are the only gins now used for extra-long staple cotton in the United States.[22]
    Munger System Gin [ edit ] The diesel-powered gin in Burton, Texas is one of the oldest in the United States that still functions.
    For a decade and a half after the end of the Civil War in 1865, a number of innovative features became widely used for ginning in the United States. They included steam power instead of animal power, an automatic feeder to assure that the gin stand ran smoothly, a condenser to make the clean cotton coming out of the gin easier to handle, and indoor presses so that cotton no longer had to be carried across the gin yard to be baled.[23] Then, in 1879, while he was running his father's gin in Rutersville, Texas, Robert S. Munger invented additional system ginning techniques. Robert and his wife, Mary Collett, later moved to Mexia, Texas, built a system gin, and obtained related patents.[24]
    The Munger System Ginning Outfit (or system gin) integrated all the ginning operation machinery, thus assuring the cotton would flow through the machines smoothly. Such system gins use air to move cotton from machine to machine.[25] Munger's motivation for his inventions included improving employee working conditions in the gin. However, the selling point for most gin owners was the accompanying cost savings while producing cotton both more speedily and of higher quality.[26]
    By the 1960s, many other advances had been made in ginning machinery, but the manner in which cotton flowed through the gin machinery continued to be the Munger system.[27]
    Economic Historian William H. Phillips referred to the development of system ginning as "The Munger Revolution" in cotton ginning.[28] He wrote,
    "[The Munger] innovations were the culmination of what geographer Charles S. Aiken has termed the second ginning revolution, in which the privately owned plantation gins were replaced by large-scale public ginneries. This revolution, in turn, led to a major restructuring of the cotton gin industry, as the small, scattered gin factories and shops of the nineteenth century gave way to a dwindling number of large twentieth-century corporations designing and constructing entire ginning operations."[29]
    One of the few (and perhaps only) examples of a Munger gin left in existence is on display at Frogmore Plantation in Louisiana.
    Effects in the United States [ edit ] Prior to the introduction of the mechanical cotton gin, cotton had required considerable labor to clean and separate the fibers from the seeds.[30] With Eli Whitney's gin, cotton became a tremendously profitable business, creating many fortunes in the Antebellum South. Cities such as New Orleans, Louisiana; Mobile, Alabama; Charleston, South Carolina; and Galveston, Texas became major shipping ports, deriving substantial economic benefit from cotton raised throughout the South. Additionally, the greatly expanded supply of cotton created strong demand for textile machinery and improved machine designs that replaced wooden parts with metal. This led to the invention of many machine tools in the early 19th century.[1]
    The invention of the cotton gin caused massive growth in the production of cotton in the United States, concentrated mostly in the South. Cotton production expanded from 750,000 bales in 1830 to 2.85 million bales in 1850. As a result, the region became even more dependent on plantations that used enslaved American labor, with plantation agriculture becoming the largest sector of its economy.[31] While it took a single slave about ten hours to separate a single pound of fiber from the seeds, a team of two or three slaves using a cotton gin could produce around fifty pounds of cotton in just one day.[32] The number of slaves rose in concert with the increase in cotton production, increasing from around 700,000 in 1790 to around 3.2 million in 1850.[33] The invention of the cotton gin led to an increased demands for slaves in the American South, reversing the economic decline that had occurred in the region during the late 18th-century.[34] The cotton gin thus "transformed cotton as a crop and the American South into the globe's first agricultural powerhouse".[35]
    An 1896 advertisement for the Lummus cotton gin
    Because of its inadvertent effect on American slavery, and on its ensuring that the South's economy developed in the direction of plantation-based agriculture (while encouraging the growth of the textile industry elsewhere, such as in the North), the invention of the cotton gin is frequently cited as one of the indirect causes of the American Civil War.[4][36][37]
    Modern cotton gins [ edit ] Diagram of a modern cotton gin plant, displaying numerous stages of production
    In modern cotton production, cotton arrives at industrial cotton gins either in trailers, in compressed rectangular "modules" weighing up to 10 metric tons each or in polyethylene wrapped round modules similar to a bale of hay produced during the picking process by the most recent generation of cotton pickers. Cotton arriving at the gin is sucked in via a pipe, approximately 16 inches (41 cm) in diameter, that is swung over the cotton. This pipe is usually manually operated, but is increasingly automated in modern cotton plants. The need for trailers to haul the product to the gin has been drastically reduced since the introduction of modules. If the cotton is shipped in modules, the module feeder breaks the modules apart using spiked rollers and extracts the largest pieces of foreign material from the cotton. The module feeder's loose cotton is then sucked into the same starting point as the trailer cotton.
    The cotton then enters a dryer, which removes excess moisture. The cylinder cleaner uses six or seven rotating, spiked cylinders to break up large clumps of cotton. Finer foreign material, such as soil and leaves, passes through rods or screens for removal. The stick machine uses centrifugal force to remove larger foreign matter, such as sticks and burrs, while the cotton is held by rapidly rotating saw cylinders.
    The gin stand uses the teeth of rotating saws to pull the cotton through a series of "ginning ribs", which pull the fibers from the seeds which are too large to pass through the ribs. The cleaned seed is then removed from the gin via an auger conveyor system. The seed is reused for planting or is sent to an oil mill to be further processed into cottonseed oil and cottonseed meal. The lint cleaners again use saws and grid bars, this time to separate immature seeds and any remaining foreign matter from the fibers. The bale press then compresses the cotton into bales for storage and shipping. Modern gins can process up to 15 tonnes (33,000 lb) of cotton per hour.
    Modern cotton gins create a substantial amount of cotton gin residue (CGR) consisting of sticks, leaves, dirt, immature bolls, and cottonseed. Research is currently under way to investigate the use of this waste in producing ethanol. Due to fluctuations in the chemical composition in processing, there is difficulty in creating a consistent ethanol process, but there is potential to further maximize the utilization of waste in the cotton production.[38][5]
    See also [ edit ] Prattville Gin FactoryReferences [ edit ] Notes
    ^ a b Roe, Joseph Wickham (1916), English and American Tool Builders, New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, LCCN 16011753 . Reprinted by McGraw-Hill, New York and London, 1926 (LCCN 27-24075); and by Lindsay Publications, Inc., Bradley, Illinois, (ISBN 978-0-917914-73-7). ^ a b c d Lakwete, 1''6. ^ Habib, Irfan (February 3, 2018). Economic History of Medieval India, 1200-1500. Pearson Education India. ISBN 9788131727911 '' via Google Books. ^ a b Kelly, Martin. "Top Five Causes of the Civil War: Leading up to Secession and the Civil War". About.com. Retrieved March 14, 2011. ^ a b inventors.about.com; "Background on the Cotton Gin", retrieved October 22, 2010. ^ Lakwete, 182. ^ "Making Cotton '' The Tools of The Trade". Fifteeneightyfour '' Academic Perspectives from Cambridge University Press. June 5, 2013 . Retrieved September 9, 2018 . ^ Bellis, Mary. inventors.about.com; "The Cotton Gin and Eli Whitney", retrieved March 12, 2012. ^ Baber, Zaheer (1996). The Science of Empire: Scientific Knowledge, Civilization, and Colonial Rule in India. Albany: State University of New York Press. p. 57. ISBN 0-7914-2919-9. ^ Irfan Habib (2011), Economic History of Medieval India, 1200''1500, p. 53, Pearson Education ^ Irfan Habib (2011), Economic History of Medieval India, 1200''1500, pp. 53''54, Pearson Education ^ Irfan Habib (2011), Economic History of Medieval India, 1200''1500, p. 54, Pearson Education ^ Karl Marx (1867). Chapter 16: "Machinery and Large-Scale Industry". Das Kapital. ^ Hargrett, Elizabeth; Dobbs, Chris (June 6, 2017). "Cotton Gins". New Georgia Encyclopedia. ^ "Who Invented the Cotton Gin and How Did it Impact History?". ^ "Catharine Littlefield Greene, Brain Behind the Cotton Gin". Finding Dulcinea. March 4, 2010 . Retrieved November 6, 2013 . ^ Harr, M. E. (1977). Mechanics of particulate media: A probabilistic approach. McGraw-Hill. ^ Lakwete, 64''76. ^ The American Historical Review by Henry Eldridge Bourne, Robert Livingston SchuylerEditors: 1895 '' July 1928; J.F. Jameson and others.; Oct. 1928''Apr. 1936, H.E. Bourne and others; July 1936''Apr. 1941, R.L. Schuyler and others; July 1941'' G.S. Ford and others. Published 1991, American Historical Association [etc.], pp 90''101. ^ Lakwete, Angela. "Fones McCarthy". Encyclopedia of Alabama. Auburn University . Retrieved October 13, 2017 . ^ Shofner, Jerrel H.; Rogers, William Warren (April 1962). "Sea Island Cotton in Ante-Bellum Florida". The Florida Historical Quarterly. 40 (4): 378''79. ^ Gillum, Marvis M.; Van Doorn, D. W.; Norman, B.M.; Owen, Charles (1994). "Roller Ginning". In Anthony, Stanley W.; Mayfield, William D. (eds.). Cotton Ginner's Handbook. United States Department of Agriculture. p. 244. ISBN 9780788124204 . Retrieved October 13, 2017 . ^ Aiken, Charles S. (April 1973). "The Evolution of Cotton Ginning in the Southeastern United States". Geographical Review. 63 (2): 205. ^ Mann, Sally (2016). Hold still : a memoir with photographs. Little, Brown and Company. pp. 314''317. ISBN 978-0-316-24775-7. ^ Atkinson, Edward (June 1, 1880). "Report on the Cotton Manufacturers of the United States". In Department of Interior, Census Office. Report on the Manufacturers of the United States at the Tenth Census. Government Printing Office. pp. 937''984. ^ Mann, Sally (2016). Hold still : a memoir with photographs. Little, Brown and Company. p. 318. ISBN 978-0-316-24775-7. ^ Aiken, Charles S. (April 1973). "The Evolution of Cotton Ginning in the Southeastern United States". Geographical Review. 63 (2): 205''206. ^ Phillips, William (1994). "Making a Business of It: The Evolution of Southern Cotton Gin Patenting, 1831-1890". Agricultural History. 68 (2): 88, 90. ^ Phillips, William (1994). "Making a Business of It: The Evolution of Southern Cotton Gin Patenting, 1831-1890". Agricultural History. 68 (2): 85''86. ^ Hamner, Christopher. teachinghistory.org, "The Disaster of Innovation", retrieved July 11, 2011. ^ Pierson, Parke (September 2009). "Seeds of conflict". America's Civil War. 22 (4): 25. ^ Woods, Robert (September 1, 2009). "A Turn of the Crank Started the Civil War." Mechanical Engineering. ^ Smith, N. Jeremy (July 2009). "Making Cotton King". World Trade. 22 (7): 82. ^ Robert O. Woods (December 28, 2010). "How the Cotton Gin Started the Civil War". The American Society of Mechanical Engineers . Retrieved September 17, 2020 . ^ Underhill, Paco (2008). "The cotton gin, oil, robots and the store of 2020". Display & Design Ideas. 20 (10): 48. ^ Joe Ryan. "What Caused the American Civil War?" AmericanCivilWar.com. Retrieved March 14, 2011. ^ Randy Golden, "Causes of the Civil War". About North Georgia. Retrieved March 14, 2011. ^ Agblevor, Foster A.; Batz, Sandra; Trumbo, Jessica (February 3, 2018). "Composition and Ethanol Production Potential of Cotton Gin Residues". Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. pp. 219''230. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0057-4_17. ISBN 978-1-4612-6592-4. Bibliography
    Lakwete, Angela (2003). Inventing the Cotton Gin: Machine and Myth in Antebellum America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 9780801873942. External links [ edit ] Overview of a Cotton Gin '' USDA siteThe Story of Cotton '' National Cotton Council of America siteNational Cotton Ginners AssociationUS Cotton Gin Industry '' EH.Net Encyclopedia of Economic HistoryInvention of Cotton Gin '' eHistory.comCotton: the fiber of life '' includes a schematic diagram illustrating the seed removal processVideo of manual cotton gin in operation via YouTube
  Triangular trade - Wikipedia
    Link to Article
    Archived Version
    Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:19
    Trade among three ports or regions
    Depiction of the classical model of the triangular trade
    Depiction of the triangular trade of slaves, sugar, and rum with New England instead of Europe as the third corner
    Triangular trade or triangle trade is a historical term indicating trade among three ports or regions. Triangular trade usually evolves when a region has export commodities that are not required in the region from which its major imports come. Triangular trade thus provides a method for rectifying trade imbalances between the above regions.
    Historically the particular routes were also shaped by the powerful influence of winds and currents during the age of sail. For example, from the main trading nations of Western Europe, it was much easier to sail westwards after first going south of 30 N latitude and reaching the so-called "trade winds"; thus arriving in the Caribbean rather than going straight west to the North American mainland. Returning from North America, it is easiest to follow the Gulf Stream in a northeasterly direction using the westerlies. A triangle similar to this, called the volta do mar was already being used by the Portuguese, before Christopher Columbus' voyage, to sail to the Canary Islands and the Azores. Columbus simply expanded this triangle outwards, and his route became the main way for Europeans to reach, and return from, the Americas.
    Atlantic triangular slave trade [ edit ] The best-known triangular trading system is the transatlantic slave trade that operated from the late 16th to early 19th centuries, carrying slaves, cash crops, and manufactured goods between West Africa, Caribbean or American colonies and the European colonial powers, with the northern colonies of British North America, especially New England, sometimes taking over the role of Europe.[1] The use of African slaves was fundamental to growing colonial cash crops, which were exported to Europe. European goods, in turn, were used to purchase African slaves, who were then brought on the sea lane west from Africa to the Americas, the so-called Middle Passage.[2] Despite being driven primarily by economic needs, Europeans sometimes had a religious justification for their actions. In 1452, for instance, Pope Nicholas V, in the Dum Diversas, granted to the kings of Spain and Portugal "full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens [Muslims] and pagans and any other unbelievers ... and to reduce their persons into perpetual slavery."[3]
    Diagram illustrating the stowage of African slaves on a British
    slave ship.
    A classic example is the colonial molasses trade. Merchants purchased raw sugar (often in its liquid form, molasses) from plantations in the Caribbean and shipped it to New England and Europe, where it was sold to distillery companies that produced rum. The profits from the sale of sugar were used to purchase rum, furs, and lumber in New England which merchants shipped to Europe. With the profits from the European sales, merchants purchased Europe's manufactured goods, including tools and weapons. Then the merchants shipped those manufactured goods, along with the American sugar and rum, to West Africa where they were bartered for slaves. The slaves were then brought back to the Caribbean to be sold to sugar planters. The profits from the sale of slaves in Brazil, the Caribbean islands, and the American South were then used to buy more sugar, restarting the cycle. The trip itself took five to twelve weeks.
    The loss of the slaver
    Luxborough Galley in 1727 ("I.C. 1760"), lost in the last leg of the triangular trade, between the Caribbean and Britain.
    The first leg of the triangle was from a European port to Africa, in which ships carried supplies for sale and trade, such as copper, cloth, trinkets, slave beads, guns and ammunition.[4] When the ship arrived, its cargo would be sold or bartered for slaves. On the second leg, ships made the journey of the Middle Passage from Africa to the New World. Many slaves died of disease in the crowded holds of the slave ships. Once the ship reached the New World, enslaved survivors were sold in the Caribbean or the American colonies. The ships were then prepared to get them thoroughly cleaned, drained, and loaded with export goods for a return voyage, the third leg, to their home port,[5] from the West Indies the main export cargoes were sugar, rum, and molasses; from Virginia, tobacco and hemp. The ship then returned to Europe to complete the triangle.
    However, because of several disadvantages that slave ships faced compared to other trade ships, they often returned to their home port carrying whatever goods were readily available in the Americas and filled up a large part or all of their capacity with ballast. Other disadvantages include the different form of the ships (to carry as many humans as possible, but not ideal to carry a maximum amount of produce) and the variations in the duration of a slave voyage, making it practically impossible to pre-schedule appointments in the Americas, which meant that slave ships often arrived in the Americas out-of-season. When the ships did reach their intended ports, only about 90% of the passengers survived the journey across the middle passage. Due to the slaves being transported in tight, confined spaces, a significant percentage of the group that started perished on board or shortly after arrival due to disease and lack of nourishment.[6][unreliable source? ] Cash crops were transported mainly by a separate fleet which only sailed from Europe to the Americas and back, mitigating the impact of the slaves' involvement. The Triangular trade is a trade model, not an exact description of the ship's route.[7] In his books, Herbert S. Klein has often emphasised that in many fields (cost of trade, ways of transport, mortality levels, earnings and benefits of trade for the Europeans and the "so-called triangular trade"), the non-scientific literature has created a "legend", which the contemporary historiography refuted a long time ago.[8]
    A 2017 study provides evidence for the hypothesis that the export of gunpowder to Africa increased the transatlantic slave trade: "A one percent increase in gunpowder set in motion a 5-year gun-slave cycle that increased slave exports by an average of 50%, and the impact continued to grow over time."[9]
    New England [ edit ] New England also made rum from Caribbean sugar and molasses, which it shipped to Africa as well as within the New World.[10] Yet, the "triangle trade" as considered in relation to New England was a piecemeal operation. No New England traders are known to have completed a sequential circuit of the full triangle, which took a calendar year on average, according to historian Clifford Shipton.[11] The concept of the New England Triangular trade was first suggested, inconclusively, in an 1866 book by George H. Moore, was picked up in 1872 by historian George C. Mason, and reached full consideration from a lecture in 1887 by American businessman and historian William B. Weeden.[12]The song "Molasses to Rum" from the musical 1776 vividly describes this form of the triangular trade.
    Newport, Rhode Island was a major port involved in the colonial triangular slave trade. Many significant Newport merchants and traders participated in the trade working closely with merchants and traders in the Caribbean and Charleston, South Carolina.[13]
    Graph depicting the number of slaves imported from Africa from 1501 to 1866
    Statistics [ edit ] According to research provided by Emory University[14] as well as Henry Louis Gates Jr., an estimated 12.5 million slaves were transported from Africa to colonies in North and South America. The website Voyages: The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database assembles data regarding past trafficking in slaves from Africa. It shows that the top four nations were Portugal, Great Britain, France, and Spain.
    SpainPortugalGreat BritainNetherlandsU.S.A.FranceDenmark1,061,5245,848,2663,259,441554,336305,3261,381,404111,040Other triangular trades [ edit ] The term "triangular trade" also refers to a variety of other trades.
    A triangular trade is hypothesized to have taken place among ancient East Greece (and possibly Attica), Kommos, and Egypt.[15]A trade pattern which evolved before the American Revolutionary War among Great Britain, the Colonies of British North America, and British colonies in the Caribbean. This typically involved exporting raw resources, such as fish (especially salt cod), agricultural produce or lumber, from British North American colonies to slaves and planters in the West Indies; sugar and molasses from the Caribbean; and various manufactured commodities from Great Britain.[16]The shipment of Newfoundland salt cod and corn from Boston in British vessels to southern Europe.[17] This also included the shipment of wine and olive oil to Britain.A new "sugar triangle" developed in the 1820s and 1830s whereby American ships took local produce to Cuba, then brought sugar or coffee from Cuba to the Baltic coast (Russian Empire and Sweden), then bar iron and hemp back to New England.[18]See also [ edit ] North Atlantic triangleTransatlantic relationsNotes [ edit ] ^ About.com: The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade. Accessed 6 November 2007. ^ "Triangular Trade". National Maritime Museum. Archived from the original on 25 November 2011. ^ Curran, Charles E. (2003). Change in Official Catholic Moral Teaching. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press. p. 67. ^ Scotland and the Abolition of the Slave Trade Archived 2012-01-03 at the Wayback Machine. Accessed 28 March 2007. ^ A. P. Middleton, Tobacco Coast. ^ "Death Toll From The Slave Trade". World Future Fund . Retrieved 9 February 2018 . ^ Emmer, P.C.: The Dutch in the Atlantic Economy, 1580''1880. Trade, Slavery and Emancipation. Variorum Collected Studies Series CS614, 1998. ^ Klein, H.S.:The Atlantic Slave Trade (Cambridge:The University of Cambridge, 1999) ^ Whatley, Warren C. (2017). "The Gun-Slave Hypothesis and the 18th Century British Slave Trade" (PDF) . Explorations in Economic History. 67: 80''104. doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2017.07.001. ^ Slavery in Rhode Island Slavery in the North Accessed 11 September 2011. ^ Curtis, Wayne. And a Bottle of Rum. New York: Three Rivers Press, 2006''2007. ISBN 978-0-307-33862-4. page 117. ^ Curtis, Wayne. And a Bottle of Rum. New York: Three Rivers Press, 2006''2007. ISBN 978-0-307-33862-4. p. 119. ^ Deutsch, Sarah (1982). "The Elusive Guineamen: Newport Slavers, 1735-1774". The New England Quarterly. 55 (2): 229''253. doi:10.2307/365360. JSTOR 365360. ^ Slave Voyages, Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade - Estimates ^ Jones, Donald W.; Archaeological Institute of America; University of Pennsylvania. University Museum (2000). "Crete's External Relations in the Early Iron Age". External relations of early Iron Age Crete, 1100''600 B.C. p. 97. ^ Kurlansky, Mark. Cod: A Biography of the Fish That Changed the World. New York: Walker, 1997. ISBN 0-8027-1326-2. ^ Morgan, Kenneth. Bristol and the Atlantic Trade in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. ISBN 0-521-33017-3. pp. 64''77. ^ Chris Evans and G¶ran Ryd(C)n, Baltic Iron in the Atlantic World in the Eighteenth Century : Brill, 2007 ISBN 978-90-04-16153-5, 273. External links [ edit ] The Transatlantic Slave Trade Database, a portal to data concerning the history of the triangular trade of transatlantic slave trade voyages.Report of the Brown University Steering Committee on Slavery and Justice
Clips
  23. TBC43 - How 'Communism' Brought Racial Equality To The South 3 (Red Rrecruitment).mp3
  24. Why African-Americans left the south in droves — and what's bringing them back 1.mp3
  25. Why African-Americans left the south in droves — and what's bringing them back 2.mp3
  26. Discrimination and Disparities with Thomas Sowell 1.mp3
  27. TBC02 - Recap - No Agenda No Man 1.mp3
  28. TBC02 Recap - No Agenda No Man 2.mp3
  29. TBC02 - Recap - No Agenda No Man 3.mp3
  30. What is MFAC explained (DONATION)..mp3
  31. TBC12 - Media, MLK and the Civil Rights Movement 1.mp3
  32. TBC12 - Media, MLK and the Civil Rights Movement 2.mp3
  33. TBC19 - Malcolm X's Legendary Speech - The Ballot or the Bullet 1.mp3
  34. TBC19 - Malcolm X's Legendary Speech - The Ballot or the Bullet 3.mp3
  35. TBC19 - Malcolm X's Legendary Speech - The Ballot or the Bullet 4.mp3
  36. TBC19 - Malcolm X's Legendary Speech - The Ballot or the Bullet 5.mp3
  37. TBC21 - Gloria Steinem, a radical CIA agent.mp3
  38. TBC21 - Gloria Steinem, a radical CIA agent 2.mp3
  39. TBC21 - Gloria Steinem Targeted Black Women.mp3
  40. Black Vietnam War Veteran Speaking Truth 1.mp3
  02. Slavery to Mass Incarceration 1.mp3
  03. TBC38 - The Heritage of Slavery (1968) w Fannie Lou Hamer & Lerone Bennett, Jr. (Massa Speaks) 2.mp3
  04. TBC38 - The Heritage of Slavery (1968) w Fannie Lou Hamer & Lerone Bennett, Jr. (Massa Speaks) 3.mp3
  05. Slavery to Mass Incarceration 2.mp3
  06. Before cotton, sugar established American reliance on slave labor 1.mp3
  07. Before cotton, sugar established American reliance on slave labor 2.mp3
  08. King Cotton American History through Southern Eyes 1.mp3
  09. King Cotton American History through Southern Eyes 2.mp3
  10. TBC37- NPR - What The Emancipation Proclamation Didn't Do 1.mp3
  11. TBC37 - NPR - What The Emancipation Proclamation Didn't Do 2.mp3
  12. TBC37 - CSPAN - Lerone Bennett Jr.- Was Abraham Lincoln Really a Racist Did He Want to End Slavery (2000).mp3
  13. TBC37 - CSPAN - Lerone Bennett Jr.- Was Abraham Lincoln Really a Racist Did He Want to End Slavery (2000) 2.mp3
  14. TBC37 - 1619 Podcast - The Land of Our Fathers, Part 1.1.mp3
  15. TBC37 -1619 Podcast - The Land of Our Fathers, Part 1.2.mp3
  15a. Z- Mike Murdock - I love new money! (DONATION).mp3
  16. King Cotton American History through Southern Eyes 3 (After Civil War).mp3
  17. Slavery to Mass Incarceration 3 (Civil War to Civil Rights).mp3
  18. Genealogist Who Tracks Down Modern-Day Slavery Practices 1.mp3
  19. Genealogist Who Tracks Down Modern-Day Slavery Practices 2.mp3
  20. TBC09 - One Drop Dr. Yaba Blay on CNN Newsroom with Don Lemon 2.mp3
  21. TBC48 - Black Heritage Trail of NH - Ritual Sacrifice 2 (Striving for White).mp3
  22. TBC43 - How 'Communism' Brought Racial Equality To The South 2 (Red Sharecroppers).mp3
Music in this Episode
  Intro: Nas - Blaze a 50 - 7 seconds
  Outro: Bobby Womack - We've only just begun 3 seconds
ShowNotes Archive
Donate to the show at moefundme.com
Search for us in your podcast directory or use this link to subscribe to the feed
Podcast Feed
For more information: MoeFactz.com