JAMES FETZER: Mona Alexis Pressley: Nobody Died at the Las Vegas Concert

Mona Alexis Pressley 

Touching: Except that they died at different times or different dates or in different states or from different causes of death

Those who have been publicly identified as "victims" of the 1 October 2017 shooting in Las Vegas, it turns out, died at other times and other locations and of other causes . Some of the m do not even exist but were created through a photo-shop program that produces the illusion of an entirely different person. If this seem initially unbelievable , when you finish this article , look back at the photos of the victims and see if you can find the same person in many of the others. This study will uncover the beginning of the research conducted to this date, with new findings to follow.  

  It is important that Americans pay attention, stand-up and demand answers and not relinquish until the entire truth comes out. If Americans remain apathetic, in denial, or just plain lazy, we run the risk of losing all freedom , including what 's left of the right to bear arms. It is difficult to wrap one's mind around a government so corrupt that it could orchestrate a " false flag" event this elaborate, until you reflect upon "Operation Northwoods" of 1962. This unclassified document should be read by every American to teach them the lengths the US government will go to to fund its wars and continue to enslave its own people.

There’s a segment of the world wide web that has been calling the mass shooting in Las Vegas on 1 October a "staged event" or a " false flag". The brave souls who have been going with their gut feelings after watching the production unfold on television have been getting blasted by the Mainstream Media and the Social Media , which at one time, but no longer, used to be the place to voice daring opinions. Even one's own peers have put the pressure on "conspiracy theorists" , who are preferably called "conspiracy realists" or "conspiracy analysts".  

This shooting was strikinglysimilar to the event in Newtown, CT, at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012 in the manner in which it was presented by the media. For those unfamiliar with the Sandy Hook school shooting, the book NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015) edited by Dr. James Fetzer ( from moonrockbooks.com in its 2nd edition but available for free as a pdf in its first) is the best way to catch up on " false flags" and hoaxes that our government conducts in collaboration with state and local authorities. Following that event, which turned out to be a two-day FEMA drill, conspiracy realists went to work and have effectively eviscerated the official account. Let this be true of Las Vegas, too.

The Las Vegas "Victims"

The first victim, Christopher Louis Roybal, born 10/09/1988 was listed as one of the victims of the shooting. However, after searching obituaries there was a discrepancy in the date listed as to when this person died. Both obituaries were found on Legacy.com and listed two different obituaries for Roybal with two different dates of death. The dates were 1 and 2 October 2017. A pattern was emerging that appeared to warrant more investigation. A fter a closer look on the internet about Mr. Roybal’s death, this heading and description ("christopher roybal dies on october 2, 2017 in california") was found on the search engine page:

It was either missed by the production company that put together the shooting (Crowds on Demand) or else the title initially listed can not be changed. The content was changed but the search engine link , which was created first, tells the entire story. Mr. Roybal passed away , not in Las Vegas, NV, but in Corona , CA. The obituary , but not the search -engine heading for the obituary , was changed, a pattern that we will see emerge again and again.  

The second victim , Heather Alvarado, born 9/20/82 had a similar discrepancy in her two obituary notices. An earlier listing places her death in Enoch, UT: There was an error in the actual obituary where they must have tried to take out the real place she died, which was not Las Vegas, NV, but Enoch, UT. Instead they kept the name of the city, "Enoch", in between her twice -listed name. Susan Smith, 53, was the third victim found to have not died at the concert in Las Vegas. The obituary was changed to say she died in Las Vegas , but the rest of the obituary does not talk about any shooting death and also requests donations to the Cancer Society:

As with other examples examined here, the same problem occurs the obituary and search engine page -headline, where the link to the obit uary is not the same. 

Sandra Casey, born 11/1/1982 was the fourth victim that wasn't a victim but did die. The search engine in regard to her death listed Sandra passing away in Vermont (below): Brennan Stewart is the fifth victim to have died at a different location and also a different date. The search engine produced   title that Stewart passed away in North Las Vegas which is on the opposite side of where the Las Vegas shooting took place. It also states in the search engine heading that he died on 2 October 2017, not 1 October 2017.  Angela Gomez was the sixth in the long line of mistakes made in obituary notices in regard to places and dates. In the search engine in regard to her death she was listed to have died in Riverside , CA, rather than Las Vegas, NV, on 1 October 2017.  Jennifer Parks, 35, 1/18/81, was the seventh victim to have died in Lancaster, CA, not Las Vegas, NV:   The eight victim, Carrie Rae Banette, passed away in California, not in Nevada, as listed below in the obits.  The ninth victim, Rocio Guille also passed away in California rather than Nevada:   The obituary that followed the link listed above: 1 October 2017 - Anaheim, California: The tenth victim, Christopher Hazencomb, passed away 2 October 2017 in Camarillo, CA: The funeral home wrote up a tribute for him with the information about his passing and other information. Everything but his name was erased but the page remains. Pretty fishy. The eleventh victim, Victor Link, passed away on 1 October 2017 but again in California:   According to this blog post by his mother, twelfth victim , Jordan McLldoom, committed suicide : The thirteenth victim, Patricia Mestas , passed away in California:

Jordyn Rivera, the fourteenth victim, also passed away in California on 1 October 2017:

Michelle Vo, the fifteenth victim, passed away in California on 1 October 2017 in both the search engine title and the obit: 

The sixteenth victim, Hannah Ahlers passed away in California on 1 October 2017:

The seventeenth victim, Adrian Murfitt, died, not in Nevada but in Alaska on 1 October 2017:  

The eighteenth victim was Denise Burditus , who did die in Las Vegas, Nevada, but at a hospital on 2 October and not at the concert in her husband’s arms as he stated in an interview. She passed away at Spring Valley hospital with no mention of having been shot.

The nineteenth victim is the last person even though there are more victims who died in their home state, but the proof will have to be presented at a later date when evidence is available. The nineteenth victim is the most confusing and took a minute to figure out.

Charleston Hartfield, there are two of them. One was born in 1965 that worked for the LVMPD, retired from the military (82nd Airborne) and wrote the book about his experiences on the street. This man is much older then Charleston #2 and the one who died in his home in Henderson, NV. He is also Charleston #2’s father. The se pictures are of older Charleston at different ages. The banner Charleston and wife, Denita, are wearing was photo-shopped from 88 to 98: 

Here is the search engine title to tell you where the older Charleston died. He is the one buried at the Veterans Cemetery in Boulder City.  

Denita is the one in the pics that appears to be the children’s mother but she is really their grandmother. The woman standing with her is the children’s mother, Veronica, and they are mourning their grandfather, thank God, not their Dad.  The younger Charleston is still alive and working in San Bernardino, since they are the ones that listed his picture as a cop or he could be in the military in another state. He is also the one that is in the National Guard or could now be active duty someplace other than Las Vegas.

We should also look at the alleged shooter, Stephen Paddock, and his son, Eric Paddock. My suspicion is that Stephen and Eric probably work for the FBI, where they , as a team, brought the crime scene props, including 23 assault weapons, to the Mandalay Bay suite room and staged the scene there. That is why the police and the FBI do not want to look for a second or a third shooter, in spite of overwhelming evidence that multiple shooters were simulated by video special effects that accompanied the audio special effects: the sounds of automatic weapons firing. According to the official narrative, Stephen is the one and only shooter--and they want to stick with the script!

[Editor's note: Scott Bennett has done a nice critique of the arrangement in the suite after the event had drawn to a conclusion, where we have a body lying on its back with blood coming from the back of his head. But there are too few shell casing for what would have to have been the expenditure of thousands of rounds, if the audio and visual effects had been produce by real shooting. Not only are they not present, but some shell casings are on top of the blood, when they should be under it; and others are for blanks and CO2s, which are used for pellet guns. Even the suicide weapon is not in an appropriate location, which means that the death scene, like the rest of the Las Vegs event, was also staged:

Las Vegas Update with Dr. James Fetzer and Scott Bennett


All big one big happy drill that the American public were not in on. The crowd at the concert were not in the know and that is why they ran to get away at the sound of gun shots. After everyone was gone , the stage lights went on and the actors got to work setting up the crime scene. There were people who were hurt running away, but no one appears to have been actually shot --and if someone claims they were, then it requires proof by showing the gun wound and medical records (which, alas, can also be faked). The expert analyses of a military surgeon and by an American trauma surgeon, who confirmed that all of the patients shown in hospital rooms are acting, where none of their alleged wounds is real, the presumption should be that the other "victims" are also fake. 

Overall, it should be evident that all of these errors in the obituaries are not just just a coincidence along with the rest of the puzzle being added to this article. With the police changing their story, the FBI deleting video recordings on witness phones and laptops, the review of alleged "victims" presented here shows that, time and time again, they were using person who had died in different places or on different dates or in different states and from different causes of death. The Clark County Coroner's Office is on lock-down, no doubt because it would have been besieged with requests for death certificates and autopsy reports--and they don't have any! We even have a photograph showing bodies being moved from a funeral home hearse for transport to be used as additional "victims" of the Las Vegas shooting. 
Apparently delivering bodies for use as props in the Las Vegas movie
This study has reviewed twenty of the purported "victims" of the Las Vegas event (counting Paddock among the victims, which appears to be appropriate. Twenty is less that the fifty-eight who are alleged to have died. But it establishes a prima facie case in support of the conclusion that the "victims" were fabricated and that nobody died at the concert. In the absence of authentic e vidence sufficient to overcome that presumption, that inference deserves acceptance in the tentative and fallible fashion of science. The proof of fakery appears to increase by the day. 

With access to additional evidence, we have the prospect of confirming or disconfirming the best supported hypothesis, which is that the Las Vegas event was not real but was a movie: a made-for-television production. So much has emerged about those who benefit by selling their stock (only to buy it back at a vastly reduced price), by putting shorts on MGM/Mandalay Bay (to make vast sums if the stock should drop) and even the prediction that scanners will now be required at every hotel and casino. There are other fringe benefits, but it certainly looks as though buying extras via CrowdsonDemand was a cost-effective expenditure.