VIDEO-U.N. Apologizes for Role in Haiti’s 2010 Cholera Outbreak - The New York Times




U.N. Apologizes for 2010 Cholera Outbreak

Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the United Nations was "profoundly sorry" for the outbreak in Haiti, which first developed near a U.N. base.

Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, the United Nations deeply regrets the loss of life and suffering caused by the cholera outbreak in Haiti. On behalf of the United Nations, I want to say very clearly we apologize to the Haitian people. We simply did not do enough with regard to the cholera outbreak and its spread in Haiti. We are profoundly sorry for our role. This has cast a shadow upon the relationship between the United Nations and the people of Haiti. It is a blemish on the reputation of U.N. Peacekeeping and the organization worldwide. For the sake of the Haitian people, but more so for the sake of the United Nations itself, we have a moral responsibility to act and we have a collective responsibility to deliver.

Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the United Nations was "profoundly sorry" for the outbreak in Haiti, which first developed near a U.N. base. Credit Credit... Associated Press

UNITED NATIONS — After six years and 10,000 deaths, the United Nations issued a carefully worded public apology on Thursday for its role in the 2010 cholera outbreak in Haiti and the widespread suffering it has caused since then.

The mea culpa, which Secretary General Ban Ki-moon delivered before the General Assembly, avoided any mention of who brought cholera to Haiti, even though the disease was not present in the country until United Nations peacekeepers arrived from Nepal, where an outbreak was underway.

The peacekeepers lived on a base that often leaked waste into a river, and the first cholera cases in the country appeared in Haitians who lived nearby. Numerous scientists have long argued that the base was the source of the outbreak, but for years United Nations officials refused to accept responsibility.

Even though Mr. Ban’s office has acknowledged that the United Nations had played a role in the outbreak, his apology on Thursday was limited to how the world body responded to the outbreak, not how it started.

“We simply did not do enough with regard to the cholera outbreak and its spread in Haiti,” Mr. Ban said on Thursday. “We are profoundly sorry about our role.”

Apologies are rare for the United Nations. In 1999, Mr. Ban’s predecessor, Kofi Annan, expressed “deep remorse” for the organization’s failure to protect civilians from the genocide in Rwanda five years earlier.

Mr. Ban’s apology — belated in the view of his critics — is part of his push for redress in Haiti before the end of his 10-year tenure on Dec. 31. Yet the people of Haiti have seen few tangible benefits so far.

The United Nations has not yet met its promise to eradicate cholera once and for all from Haiti, though Mr. Ban’s aides said on Thursday that they were close to raising the $200 million they say they need to fix Haiti’s water and sanitation system and treat Haitians for cholera. Nor has the United Nations yet raised an additional $200 million it wants for “material assistance” to families and communities that have suffered; donor nations have not yet come forward with the funds.

“It is aimed at providing a meaningful — but necessarily imperfect — response to the impact of cholera on individuals, families and communities,” Mr. Ban said in a report made public on Thursday.

Mr. Ban goaded countries to make “voluntary contributions,” or else other means would have to be pursued, which can be interpreted only to be compulsory dues. “Eliminating cholera from Haiti, and living up to our moral responsibility to those who have been most directly affected, will require the full commitment of the international community and, crucially, the resources necessary,” he said.

The Haitian ambassador to the United Nations, Denis Regis, welcomed Mr. Ban’s acknowledgment of the organization’s role in the cholera outbreak, calling its previous position “morally unjustifiable.”

Few things have damaged the standing of the United Nations — and Mr. Ban’s record as its secretary general — as the cholera outbreak and particularly, his response to it.

In a country where few people have access to clean water and proper sanitation, the disease quickly spread in 2010 when United Nations peacekeepers failed to adequately follow protocols for disposing wastewater, while deployed in Haiti. Cholera surged again in the aftermath of Hurricane Matthew, which hit the nation in October.

One of the reasons the disease spread so widely, public health experts have said, is because it was allowed to; had there been a vigorous response in the first couple of years, it would have been far easier to contain, and fewer people would have died. The death toll stands at an estimated 10,000; some say it could be higher.

In the report issued on Thursday, Mr. Ban blamed perennial underfunding for cholera eradication. “Efforts were beset from the start by the challenge of insufficient funding, which has had a dramatic negative impact on the capacity to respond effectively to the disease,” he said.

Perhaps most damaging to the United Nations, which regularly presses governments around the world to pursue accountability, Mr. Ban and his aides have all along claimed immunity from prosecution under a longstanding diplomatic treaty. That view was upheld in August by a federal court in Manhattan, in response to a class-action lawsuit by cholera victims.

In recent months, Mr. Ban has expressed “moral responsibility” for the outbreak and “deep regret.” Senior United Nations officials said they had been constrained from saying any more by their lawyers, who were concerned that it would make them vulnerable to further legal claims elsewhere over misconduct or mistakes by its peacekeepers.

Mr. Ban made the apology in English, French and Haitian Creole. It was delicately worded to avoid the impression that the United Nations was taking full responsibility for cholera in Haiti. That could imply legal culpability.

The group that represents the victims, the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti, has said it has not yet decided on whether to take the matter to the United States Supreme Court to seek compensation.

Brian Concannon, the executive director of the group, called Mr. Ban’s proposals a step in the right direction. “But words alone won’t save lives or remove the stain on the U.N.’s reputation,” he said in an email. “The U.N. and its member states will have to rise to the challenge and actually fund and effectively execute the projects.”

Mr. Ban’s aides have said they would prefer to use the material assistance funds to aid communities most affected by the cholera outbreak — by giving children of survivors a free education, for instance — rather than open up a fund for individual claims for compensation. Whatever they use it for, they need the money first. Of the estimated $200 million, only $500,000 has so far been pledged.®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=3&pgtype=sectionfront&_r=1&referer=